Essays /

Comparing Plato And Aristotle Government And Concept Good Essay

Essay preview

Plato is primarily concerned with knowing the good. In the Republic, Plato intends to define justice and describes an elaborate city-state setup with the goal of being a just city. A guardian class of philosophers rules in Plato's city, because these are the only people who can know the good. Everyone else's role in the city is to do their work to support the city so that the guardians are able to philosophize. Aristotle does not follow this concept of knowing the good, but instead advocates doing good. In Aristotle's city, people should do the best they can at their craft so they can flourish and be good. This concept carries over to the politics of the city, as political scientists should do good by making just laws that allow the citizens to do good through just habituation. Because Plato is primarily concerned with knowing the good, while Aristotle is primarily concerned with being good, I will show that they have contrasting political theories, and that Aristotle's political theory is more realistic and obtainable than Plato's political theory.

Although Plato never says what the good actually is, he does state that only philosophers can know what the good is (). Plato offers two analogies as to why philosophers are capable of ruling, and why they should rule. The first is the analogy of a ship. On this ship, the captain is removed and the sailors fight for control of the ship. The sailors who take power of the ship are not the best fit to navigate, but they are the best at practicing politics and building a following of people. The sailors who are best fit to navigate do not practice politics and are not given the opportunity to rule. These sailors are the philosophers of the world; they are the best at leading a society, but because they do not practice politics, they will never rise to power.

The parable of the cave is the second analogy for philosophers. Plato describes a cave in which people are locked in a...

Read more


abil abl abolit actual advoc affair afford agre aim allow also although analog argu aristocraci aristotl arm arrang arriv assign authorit averag bad behind belief believ best birth bizarr bodi breed broad build built cannot capabl captain care carri cave charact choic choos chosen citi citizen citizenship city-st class clear cobbler combin communal compar concept concern conclus constant constitut contain contrast control convers core corrupt could craft creat criteria critic day deal decis defens defin deliber democraci deni deriv describ desir determin differ differenti disenfranchis divid done educ elabor elimin els entir entrust equal essenti ever everi everyon exampl exist explain face faith famili far fascist favor fiction fight finish first fit flourish follow form foundat frank free function gain given goal good govern guardian guidelin habitu happi help howev human idl incent inclus individu instanc instead instil intend interest involv justic keep key know label lack law lead leadership learn legisl lie life like limit live lock logic lotteri lower made make mandat mani manipul mass materi matter mean meddl metal mind mistak mobil model modern much navig neither never next nobl object obtain occasion offer oligarchi one opportun other outcom outright owe parabl part particip peopl person philosoph place plan plato poet polit politeia politi poor posit possess power practic primarili principl promot properti protect provid public pursu put radic realist realiz realli reason reflect reject remov reproduc republ requir reserv restrict return right rise role rule ruler sailor say scientist second see seek seem set setup shadow ship shoe show similar sinc singl social societi someth somewhat sovereign specif speech state still stori support surfac suscept system take taken theori thing throughout time top toward translat truth turn two type typecast unclear unjust unlik unnatur view virtu virtuous wall want wealth weapon well whether within work world would write young