Well before this century people have been in conflict over how much regulation the government should be allowed to impose. In the 18th century, Jean-Baptiste Colbert coined the term laissez-faire; it represents a situation of freedom from government intervention. It was later discussed extensively by Adam Smith, who was responsible for giving the motto laissez-faire much more conceptual clarity. Throughout the years, each president has differed with respect to how much control the government should have in monitoring the market. For example, Ronald Reagan believed that “only by reducing the growth of government, can we increase the growth of the economy” (Niskanen). President Obama, on the other hand, is clearly more supportive of government intervention, as he has worked hard to garner support for his stimulus package (i.e., The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009), which he believes will counteract the effects of the economic downturn. Government regulation has once again become an important topic as the Tea Party has begun to receive more attention. In this essay, I would ultimately like to show that regulation is, to a certain extent, a necessary responsibility of the government.

Because of the tumultuous economy that people around the world are feeling the effects of, many are beginning to think deeply about what role the government should play. In this essay, I will use specific examples to examine how government intervention affects businesses.

The examples that I will use to give validity to my argument will come primarily from an evaluation of policies that have been implemented over the years and the far-reaching results of the economic recession that we have experienced most recently (i.e., the automobile industry crisis and the housing market crisis).

Smith’s laws of the market are simple; under the right circumstances, the outcome of the market can be predictable. Why then have we experienced so much randomness in our economy? When Ronald Reagan took office, he had a plan in mind: to “cut income taxes from top to bottom, reduce the size of the federal government for the first time since the New Deal, and make the U.S. military Number One in the world” (Edwards). These initiatives were b...

+5 -4.9 1.1 10 12 15 16 17 18 18th 1981 1982 1987 1999 20 2001 2002 2008 2009 2010 2011 25 275 28 30 428 500 6 8 accord act action activ adam addit address administr aeronaut affect agre aid allianc allow almost alreadi also amadeo amelior american amid amongst amount andrew announc anoth appar appear approach argument around array articl assist associ attent august auto automobil awar away bad bail bailout bank baptist base becom begin begun behind believ benefit best bibliographi big bigger billion blame blind board bob bottom break brent brought bureaucrat busi cab campaign capac case cato central centuri certain champion chang chicago chrysler circumst citizen civil clariti class clear climat coin colbert collaps come commiss compani competit complaint conceptu condit conflict connect consensus consist consum contract contribut control corpor cost council counteract countri creat creation crise crisi crusad current custom custom-design cut damian davi dc deal decad decis decreas deepli default defin deliv democrat depart depend deregul design despit develop differ difficult disagre discuss disprov distrust done doubt dow downturn downward dream due econom economi edmund educ edward effect effort enough environment erta essay establish evalu exact examin exampl exchang expans experienc extend extens extent extern extrem fact fail failur fair fan far far-reach februari feder feel festa financi first focus follow ford foreclosur found fourth freedom furthermor futur g garner gay gdp general give gm go goal golden gone good govern grant great greatest growth guy hand hands-on hard hardship health healthcar help hesit hit holocaust homeownership hous hud i.e ibm idea impact implement import impos improv includ incom increas independ industri infrastructur initi intend intens interest intern interven intervent invest jean jean-baptist job juli june kimber known l laissez laissez-fair largest later launch law least led lee less licens life like loan long long-stand loosen lose loss machineri made maintain major make mani margin market may mean measur merger mess michigan middl militari million mind minim mobil model modern monetari money monitor mortgag most motto much nation nazi near necessari need negat neighborhood new news next nine niskanen noll number obama occur octob offic often one oper opinion oppon oppos opposit option order other outcom outlin packag paletta paradigm parent parti particular past paul peopl perhap person plan play point polici pollut popular posit potenti predict present presid presidenti press prevent price primarili probe problem produc product profit propon prosper protect prove public put qualiti quarter quarter-centuri quit race rais random rate reach reagan reaganom realiz reason rebecca receiv recent recess recoveri reduc refin regan regul reich rein reinvest relax releas repres resist respect respons restrict result reuter review revis revolut right risen robert roger role ronald safeti scorecard scrutini sec secur see seek seem seen sell septemb servic sheryl shore show shown sign signific simpl sinc situat six size slight slow small smith solv specif speech spend spiral stabil stabl stand state statement step still stimul stimulus stolberg strain strateg stretch strict strongest su success superior support t-mobil take taken tax tea telegraph telephon tend term thank theme therefor think third though throughout thus tight time today took top topic toplin trillion tumultu turmoil turn u.s ultim under unemploy unit unknown unparallel unravel unstabl urban use util valid view want way well weren white william win without work world wors worth would year yes yet