Essays /

Internet Job Search And Effect Unemployment Duration Essay

Essay preview

Internet Job Search and the Effect on Unemployment Duration

Abstract

Jobseeker behavior changed in 1990's with the introduction of non-traditional methods of searching for a job such as the Internet. Online search methods have replaced many of the traditional methods of searching for a job. In August 2000, one in four unemployed U.S. job seekers reported that they use the Internet as a method of searching for employment. Which types of persons used the Internet as a primary source to search for a job, and did searching for work online help find new jobs faster? These questions are addressed by evaluating data of unemployment durations during the last twenty years from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Job search methods of unemployed workers changed in the 1990's with the introduction of online job search methods. Prior to that, the primary methods of searching for a job were by traditional methods such as the newspaper, friends, relatives, etc. There are currently thousands of online job search sites that are used by an increasingly amount of unemployed workers. The use of Internet and recruiting sites is generally free of cost for searchers and usually cheaper for firms compared to traditional print advertisements. Job searchers can view job listings as well as company information with relative ease and have potential job matches sent to them directly via E-mail.

According to the Current Population Survey, about 19.6 million individuals, or 9.2 percent of the civilian non-institutional population ages 16 and over, reported using the Internet to search for a job between January 2001 and September 2001. Men and women were about equally likely to have used the Internet to search for a job and nearly 1 in every 10 reported using the Internet to look for a job. Similarly, about 9 percent of both whites and blacks used the Internet in their job search, but fewer than 6 percent of Hispanic individuals used these resources. Persons aged 20 to 34 years were most likely to use the Internet to look for a job. Among those aged 20 to 24, a little more than 17 percent used the Internet as part of their search for work, as did a little fewer than 17 percent of 25 to 34 year olds. In contrast, between 6 and 7 percent of teenagers and workers aged 35 and over looked for a job using the Internet.

Given the importance of job search to both employees and employers, it is not surprising that the topic has been the subject of a good deal of research. Older literature on this topic include Holzer (1987, 1988), Bortnick and Ports (1991), Osberg (1993) and Addison and Portugal (2001) compare the job-finding rates of unemployed workers using a variety of search methods such as friends and relatives, newspaper ads, private employment offices, and inquiring at the work place and how long unemployed workers spent looking for a job. With the exception of Bortnick and Ports (1991), they all found that the most effective resource for finding employment was through friends and relatives. Bortnick and Ports (1991) found that the most successful method for finding employment was by using private employment agencies.

One recent study related to my research, conducted by Kuhn and Skuterud (2000), looked at the process by which jobseekers choose to use Internet methods to look for work; and second, to estimate the causal effect of incorporating the Internet into the...

Read more

Keywords

-0.113715 -0.127152 -0.138215 -0.187804 -0.212805 -0.253621 -0.332175 -0.432692 -11 -1993 -1995 -20 -2003 -35 -86 0.0000 0.0001 0.0022 0.0036 0.0052 0.037102 0.096250 0.099091 0.1061 0.144036 0.296198 0.4635 0.574069 0.6665 0.683819 0.713328 0.713352 0.713928 0.736890 0.7679 0.8005 0.800974 0.8515 0.8859 0.9098 0.919274 0.919322 0.920328 0.9236 0.924362 0.924384 0.924428 0.9705 00 01 02 03 04 1 1.186980 1.214433 1.226741 1.636042 1.99e-05 10 10021.5 10128.9 10135.1 10226.3 10338.2 10445.7 10546.5 10617.5 10744.6 10884 11 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.6 11.7 11.8 11116.7 11270.9 115 12 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.7 12.9 13 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 13.54339 13.54625 13.6 13.63321 13.7 13.8 13.9 14 14.1 14.2 14.4 14.5 14.6 14.7 14.8 14.9 15 15.1 15.3 15.4 15.5 15.6 15.7 15.8 15.9 16 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 16.47 16.5 16.8 17 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 17.6 17.7 17.8 18 18.1 18.3 18.4 18.5 18.6 18.8 18.9 180.9246 181.0399 19 19.1 19.4 19.6 19.8 1976 1980s 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 2.358213 2.358274 2.358570 2.880170 20 20.4 20.5 20.6 2000 2001 2002 2003 229.1425 24 25 29 3 3.011305 3.176702 3.48e-06 3.8 3.9 34 348 349 35 3809.6 3908.6 3978.2 4 4.1 4.2 4.242181 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 4036.3 4119.5 4178.4 4261.3 4321.8 4385.6 4425.7 4493.9 4546.1 4613.8 4690 4767.8 4886.3 4951.9 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 5062.8 5146.6 5253.7 5367.1 5454.1 5531.9 5584.3 5716.4 5797.7 5848.8 5849.4 5888 5964.3 6 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 6035.6 6095.8 6196.1 6290.1 6380.5 6484.3 6542.7 6612.1 6674.6 6800.2 6911 7 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.9 7030.6 7115.1 7232.2 7298.3 7337.7 7432.1 7522.5 7624.1 7776.6 7866.2 8 80 8000.4 8113.8 8250.4 8381.9 8471.2 8586.7 8657.9 8789.5 8953.8 9 9.2 9.52e-06 9066.6 9174.1 92 9313.5 9519.5 9629.4 9822.8 9862.1 9953.6 abstract accept accord accur ad addison address adjust advertis affect age agenc alan alon also altern among amount anoth appear appendix approxim april aris assum august avail averag b b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 base began behavior believ benefit billion black board bortnick bureau buy c c2 canadain cannot captur case caus causal chang cheaper choos civilian claim coeffici common compani compar compens compil complementari comput conclud conduct consequ consider consist constant construct cont contain contrast control correl cost could cps cross current d data deal decemb depend desir determin didn differ difficult dimens direct discuss distinct due dum dummi durat durbin durbin-watson e e-mail earli eas econom economi effect effici eighti els empir employ employe end entir equal equilibrium error estim etc evalu even everi everyth exact except expect explain f f-statist fact factor faster fewer field file find firm first fish found four free friction friend futur gdp general given good graph greater h help higher hispan hold holzer household howev hypothesi impact import improv inabl includ incom incorpor increas indic indiffer individu ineffect inform inquir institut intens internet introduc introduct isn iza j januari job job-find jobseek journal juli krueger kuhn l labor lack larger last lead least left like list literatur littl locat long longer look lower m mail make mani match maxim may mcmaster measur meet men method might mikal million model month near need negat net new newspap non non-institut non-tradit observ occur octob offer offic often old older on-the-job one onlin optim order ordinari origin osberg outcom ownership p p-valu paper part percent percentag perform period person place point pool popul port portug posit possibl potenti predict present primari print prior privat prob probabl procedur process qualiti quarter question r r-squar r-squaredadjust ran rate rather raw receiv recent recruit reduc refer regress relat relationship replac report research reserv resourc respond result review sampl sav save say search searcher second section seek seeker sent separ septemb seri shortcom shorten shorter sign signific similar site size skuterud sourc spent squar squaredadjust stage stat state statist strategi studi subject subsequ success suitabl supplement support surpris survey t-statist take teenag term test therefor thousand time time-seri topic track tradit trend twenti two type u.s unemp unemploy unfortun unit univers unpublish upon upward use usual util valu variabl varieti various versus via view wage wait watson week well white women work worker would year york youth