Essay preview
UTMS Journal of Economics, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 1-16, 2010 M. Shamim Ansari, M. Ranga: INDIA’S FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT: CURRENT STATUS ...
Original scientific paper Received: 27.06.2010
INDIA’S FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT: CURRENT STATUS, ISSUES AND POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS Mohd. Shamim Ansari Mukesh Ranga
Bundelkhand University, Jhansi (UP) India CSJM University, Kanpur (UP) India1 Abstract: Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) as an important driver of growth. It is an important source of non debt financial resources for country for economic development. Besides it is a means of achieving technical knowhow and employment generation of employment. However, many are of the view that FDI is a big threat to sovereignty of host and domestic business houses. Faster exploitation of natural resources for profit may deprive host from such resources in long run. Midst of debate on pros and cons of FDI, world economy has observed a phenomenal change in volume and pattern of FDI. There is clearly an intense global competition of FDI. India is not behind this global race of attracting foreign investment. India emerged as an attractive FDI destination in services but has failed to evolve a manufacturing hub which has greater economic benefit. FDI though one of the important sources of financing the economic development, but not is not a solution for poverty eradication, unemployment and other economic ills. India needs a massive investment to achieve the goals of vision 20-20. Policy makers need to ensure transparency and consistency in policy making along with comprehensive long term development strategy. Key words: Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), analysis of investments in India, flow of FDI, policy recommendation.
INTRODUCTION Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is now regarded as an important driver of growth. Emerging Market Economies (EMEs) look upon FDI as one the easiest means to fulfill their financial, technical, employment generation and competitive efficiency requirements. Gradually they also realized that substantial economic growth is inevitable without global integration of business process. This created opportunities for locational advantages and thus facilitated strategic alliances, joint ventures and collaborations over R & D. 1 Mohd. Shamim Ansari, PhD., Assistant Professor, Institute of Economics and Finance, Bundelkhand University, Jhansi (UP) India, Mukesh Ranga, Ph.D., Professor, Institute of Business Management, CSJM University, Kanpur (UP), India.
1
UTMS Journal of Economics, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 1-16, 2010 M. Shamim Ansari, M. Ranga: INDIA’S FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT: CURRENT STATUS ...
The world economy has observed a phenomenal change in volume and pattern of FDI flow from developed nations to EMEs in 1980s and 1990s compared to earlier decades. The hostile attitude of developing nations regarding multinationals investment has become generous during this transition period. FDI was fostered by liberalisation and market-based reforms in EMEs. The financial sector deregulation and reforms in the industrial policy further paved the way for global investments. There is clearly an intense global competition for FDI. India has emerged as the second most attractive destination for FDI after China and ahead of the US, Russia and Brazil. In view of these facts, the present paper takes stock of current status of FDI in India, aims to find reasons for comparatively lesser flow of FDI and suggest measures to boost flow of FDI to India.
LITERATURE REVIEW Review of various literatures available on FDI reveals that foreign investment is still a matter of debate. Whether FDI is boom or bane for host countries economic growth and development? Opinions are still divided. FDI has its own advantages and disadvantages. Many scholars argue that through FDI developed nations may try to invade the sovereignty of host country. In order to earn quick profit they may exploit the natural resources at the faster rate and thus leave the host country deprived in the long run. It have been feared that FDI is a big threat to survival of domestic players. Many are of the opinion that basic objective of foreign investments is to earn profits by ignoring the overall social & economic development of the host nation. Thus, through this section an attempt has been made to discuss various issues raised by different scholars on the subject. It is universally acknowledged that FDI inflow offers many benefits to an economy. UNCTAD (1999) reported that Transnational Corporations (TNCs) can complement local development efforts by (i) increasing financial resources for development; (ii) boost export competiveness; (iii) generate employment and strengthening the skill base; (iv) protecting the environment to fulfill commitment towards social responsibility; and (v) enhancing technological capabilities through transfer, diffusion and generation. However, Te Velde, (1999) has rightly reported that in the absence of pro-active government policies there are risk that TNCs may actually inhibit technological development in a host country. Borensztein, et. al. (1998) reveals that FDI has a net crowding in effect on domestic private and public investment thus advancing overall economics growth. Crowding in effects of FDI varies with regions. There has been strong evidence of crowding-in in Asia and strong net crowding out effect in Latin America (Agosin and Mayer, 2000). By and large, studies have found a positive links between FDI and growth. However, FDI has comparatively lesser positive links in least developed economies, thereby suggesting existence of “threshold level of development” (Blomstrom and Kokka, 2003 and Blomstrom et. al., 1994). Athreye and Kapur (2001) emphasized that since the contribution of FDI to domestic capital is quite small, growth-led FDI is more likely than FDI-led growth. Dua and Rasheed (1998) indicted that the Industrial production in India had a unidirectional positive Granger-Casual impact on inward FDI flows. They also concluded that economics activity is an important determinant of FDI 2
UTMS Journal of Economics, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 1-16, 2010 M. Shamim Ansari, M. Ranga: INDIA’S FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT: CURRENT STATUS ...
inflows in India and not vice-versa. Tseng and Zebregs (2002) reported that even in case of China causality between market size/growth and magnitude of FDI holds true. There is global race for attracting FDI, but how much it would contribute to host country’s economics development is to be assessed. Developing countries need to have reached a certain level of educational, technological and infrastructure development before being able to benefit from a foreign presence in their markets. Blomstrom et. al., (1994) have rightly observed that, the host country must be capable of absorbing the new technology manifested in FDI. An additional factor that may prevent a country from reaping the full benefits of FDI is imperfect and underdeveloped financial markets (OECD 2002). India appears to be well placed in terms of reaping benefits because it has relatively well developed financial sector, strong industrial base and critical mass of well educated workers (Rajan et. al., 2008).
RESEARCH METHODLOGY Objective of the Study The present study has been undertaken with a conduct empirical analysis of status of FDI in India and made some policy recommendation to boost flow of FDI to India. Thus the objectives of the study can be enumerated as follows: a) To analyze the pattern and direction of FDI flow in India. b) To identify factors those are responsible for comparatively lesser flow of FDI. c) To identify reasons for regional imbalances in terms of flow of FDI. d) To review FDI policy of India e) To address various issue and concern relating to FDI. f) To make policy recommendation to improve the level of FDI. Nature and Source of Data The prese...