Essays /

Preferred Reference Between Books And Internet Essay

Essay preview


SCHOOL YEAR 2011-2012

A Secondary Thesis

Presented by:
Keng, Van Wesley A.
Rosete, Newehlene E.
Crencia, Janice M.
De Belen, Lalein A.
Magnate, Angelica B.

March 2012


Chapter 1


Books are the primary and traditional tools used in finding information. It is one of the things that help our young minds be filled with needed knowledge. Books have earned a trusted spot in the world’s culture as legitimate sources of information, having been awarded by an entire network of people. However, humanity evolves fast that it is being replaced by technology; internet.

Internet is considered as one of the greatest invention of the modern human race. It is often compared with a library. There are thousands of websites in the internet that students nowadays explore like the library having thousands of books. Internet has vast references that are easy to hit upon.

We, the researchers, chose doing this to know which is more preferred by the students as reference in doing their assignments. If the books are more preferred since readers can have concrete assurance that the information they get are accurate or the internet which is vastly used around the world to get updated information.

The main purpose of this study is to identify which reference is better preferred between books and internet in doing assignments of third year and fourth year students in Asian Computer College. Here are the main quandaries of attention which this study seeks:

1. What are the perceptions of the students in using books as their reference in doing their assignments?

2. What are the perceptions of the students in using internet as their reference in doing their assignments?

3. Is there a significant difference in using books and internet as reference in doing assignments?

4. What is the implication of the study?


Null Hypothesis: There is no significant difference between using books and internet in doing assignments.

Alternative Hypothesis: There is a significant difference between using books and internet in doing assignments.


Chapter 3


The researchers’ subjects in their study were 33 students from both third year and fourth year students of Asian Computer College. Two sections consists the juniors and three sections consists the seniors. Such respondents where chosen because they were matured enough to handle the questions seriously. With a 15% margin of error, the Sloven formula was chosen by the researchers to get the number of respondents. The said formula shows the most accurate distribution of samples. By the use of this, the researchers got 33 samples.

Table 1.1 Profile of Participants as to Age

|Age |Frequency (f) |Percentage (%) |Rank | |14 |3 |9.09 % |2 | |15 and above |30 |90.9 % |1 | |TOTAL |33 |100 % | |

Table 1.1 illustrates the percentage distribution of the participants concerning their ages. Out of 33 participants, 3 (9.09%) belongs to age 14 and 30 (90.9%) belongs to age 15 and above.

Table 1.2 Profile of Participants as to Gender

|Gender |Frequency (f) |Percentage (%) |Rank | |Male |17 ...

Read more


-2012 0.51 0.787 05 1 1.1 1.17 1.2 1.2955 1.33 1.37 1.5 1.50 1.51 1.67 1.77 1.83 10 100 11 12 124 13 130 130.6303 14 15 16 17 18 19 2 2.1 2.17 2.2 2.25 2.33 2.5 2.50 2.51 2.67 2.79 20 2011 2012 21 22 23 24 25 25.38 26 27 28 29 3 3.35 3.50 3.51 30 31 32 33 4 4.50 4.71 48.48 5 5.43 51.51 6 6.25 62.65 64 65.03 7 7.13 8 8147 9 9.09 90.9 accept accord accur acquir age altern alway analyz angelica answer around arrang asian assess assign assur attent averag award b belen belong best better book bring c case categori chanc chapter chose chosen close collect colleg college-mayapa combin compar comput concern conclus concret condit conduct consid consist constitut conveni could crencia critic cultur data de decis demograph depend descript deviat df differ direct distract distribut domin e earn easi easier either element encount enough entir equal error establish estim everi evolv experiment explor f fall fast feel femal fill find first follow formula found fourth frequenc frequent gender get give given got greater greatest ha handl help hit ho howev human hypothesi identifi iii iii-a iii-b illustr impli implic improv independ indic inform insight instrument internet interpret introduct invent item iv iv-a iv-b iv-c janic junior keng know knowledg lalein lazi legitim level librari like m magnat main make male march margin matur mayapa mean method mind modern multipli n n1 n2 need network never newehlen non non-direct nowaday ns nth null number observ occasion occurr often one order p page paramet particip peopl perceiv percentag percept perform pic popul precis prefer present primari problem profil purpos quandari question questionnair race random rank reader refer reject remain remark replac research resourc respond rest result ros roset s12 s22 said sampl satisfi school score second secondari section see seek seldom select senior serious show shown signifi signific sinc six size sloven sometim sop sourc spot standard state statement statist student studi subject sum summari systemat t-test tabl tabul tabular tail technolog test thesi thing third thousand three throughout tool total tradit trust two two-tail unit updat upon usag use user util valu van variabl varianc vast verbal vi websit weight wesley wherein work world x x2 y y2 year young α