Essays /

Max Weber On Bureaucracy Essay

Essay preview

Question 3 – Max Weber’s ideal-typical conceptualization of the modern bureaucracy

In modern society a bureaucratic structure is considered the most effective way of managing both public and private affairs. This has although not always been the case, and one of the first to describe the emergence and development of bureaucracy was the German sociologist Max Weber. Through his theory of rationalization and subsequent utilization of ideal types he was able to describe this phenomenon on both theoretical and analytical levels. He determined several preconditions for a bureaucratic structure and also described how the rule-bound nature and division of labour were important parts of this. His work has always been subject to much debate, and still remains an important contribution to social scientific research. Max Weber introduced the use of ”ideal types” in analyzing different socio-economic phenomena. An ideal type is created through an “analytical accentuation of certain elements in reality”. In practice this analytical accentuation draws attention to the most important aspects of a given phenomenon, and leaves out the differentiated factors which vary within different cultural contexts. This “breaking down” of factors can be very difficult, and as Weber states “Sharp differentiation in concrete fact is often impossible, but this makes clarity in the analytical distinction all the more important”. Because of the accentuation and differentiation of facts, Ideal types can be classified as analytical and conceptual constructs, which cannot be found in reality. Nonetheless, the utilization of these ideal types plays a very important role when trying to understand different phenomena in society, both on an empirical and analytical level. First of all, an ideal type creates a stylized example, making it easier to understand and focus attention to selected aspects of a given phenomenon. Secondly the ideal type provides a basis of comparison with the empirically observed reality. It can enhance the understanding of how and why a given phenomenon deviates from the ideal type. This deviation can often be explained by value-related behavior and judgment, which can be difficult to identify without having an ideal type to compare it to. The conceptual tool of ideal types is meant to be entirely free of value-judgments, but even in defining an ideal type, the scientist cannot avoid the fact that his own values influence this definition. Weber recognized this dilemma and stated that the social scientist must “…keep a cool head in the face of the ideals [values] prevailin...

Read more


1 10 11 12 13 14 15 1949 1951 1972 1978 1986 2 2001 2005 2006 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 abil abl abstract accentu accept accompani accomplish accord account accur achiev action activ administr advantag affair affectu age allan almost also although alway amount analyt analyz ancient anoth apparatus appli arbitrari area armi around aspect asset attent attitud attribut author avoid b background basi be becom behavior behaviour bound break breed bureau bureaucraci bureaucrat busi calcul call cannot capit capitalist carri case causal central centuri certain certif chain charismat claim clariti classifi claus clear collect collin combin communic compar comparison compendium complet complex complic compon compos concept conceptu concern concret condit consequ consid construct contact context continu contribut cool cornerston corpor could counteract creat critic cultur day debat defin definit demand democraci democrat depend describ desk determin develop deviat dictionari differ differenti difficult dilemma direct discharg discret distinct divis draft draw drawback earli easier econom economi educ effect effort element emerg emolu empir encyclopedia enforc enhanc enough ensur entir entranc equal essenti establish esteem even everi everybodi everyon evid exampl exercis exist expect explain extens extent extern face fact factor faith famous favor feudal fifth file first fittest fix focus form formal found four fourth free fulfil function fundament furthermor gain georg german gilj give given goal goal-ori govern greec ground guarante gunnar günther head held help hierarch higher histor histori hold horseback howev human ideal ideal-typ identifi imperson implement implicit import imposs incent inch increas indisput individu ineffect influenc infrastructur institut intern interpret introduc invit issu job john judgment keep kenneth key kingdom knowledg labour last law lay lead leav legal legal-r len level life list live longer made main make manag mani market match max mean meant meet mention met methodolog militari miner modern money monopoli much must name natur necessari negat new niel nonetheless norma number obey object oblig observ obtain occup offer offic offici often old old-ag one open oper order organ organiz orient own p.120 p.199 p.214 p.215 p.216 p.220 p.261 p.27 p.404 p.55 p.72 p.90 part pension perform permeat perpetu person phenomena phenomenon physic place play point polic polit popul posit possess possibl power practic precis precondit press presupposit prevail previous primari privat problem process progress provid public pure purpos put qualif question quick r.a randal rang rank ration rational-leg reach read realiti realiz reason receiv recogn red reduc regard regul relat relationship relianc remain repres research respons result return richard ritzer role romm room roth rule rule-bound ruler salari scienc scientif scientist second secur seem seen select self self-perpetu send separ set sever sharp sheer shift simpl six size skirbekk slow social societ societi socio socio-econom sociolog sociologist soldier solid sometim space speed state step still strive structur styliz subject subsequ suffici superior surviv swedberg system take tape task tax tax-collect technic technolog theoret theori therefor thesi third thorough though thought three time today tool toward tradit train transit translat travel tread treat tri twentieth two type typic understand unproblemat use usual util valu value-judg value-ori value-r value-rel vari verstehen violenc volum way weber weberian western wherea within without wittich word work written