Essays /

The Language Of The Government Inspector Essay

Essay preview

Paper2 Prompt1
The Language of The Government Inspector

Nikolay Gogol’s The Government Inspector does not simply exist to please the audience; it is a satire that deeply criticizes the corruption of the Russian government and the ugliness of human nature. A variety of techniques in the characters’ languages contribute to the success of this play, including different speaking styles, irony, exaggeration, asides and symbolism. These linguistic techniques and dramatic devices Gogol uses allow him to criticize various aspects of the Russian society in such a way that avoids punishment and censure from the Russian leaders. The different speaking styles between Khlestakov and other townspeople reveal the disparity between the higher and the lower class. Most of the sentences spoken by the townspeople are short and direct. For example, Dobchinsky often just repeats Bobchinsky without adding anything new. As soon as Dobchinsky believes that Khlestakov is the inspector after a short meet in the inn, Bobchinsky affirms his thought immediately without his own analysis: “Oh yes it is! Oh yes, it must be him” (228). In contrary, Khlestakov’s sentences are more complicated. These fancy speeches separate him from townspeople and allow them to believe his fake status—an official from St. Petersburg. Because the inspector whom Khlestakov pretends to be should speak complicated and flowery sentences. He describes his experience abroad in such a way: “the soup is brought in special tureens on a steamer from Paris. And the aroma when you lift the lid—well, nothing can compare with it!” (259). Compared to other people’s unpolished and shallow language, Khlestakov’s frequent vivid depiction of the food can always depict the lifestyle of the higher classes. Khlestakov also uses “Paris”, a metropolis, to further demonstrate his fake social status because it shows that he has been to such a big city. Even Khlestakov may have never tasted this kind of soup before, the meticulous description and reasonable explanation lend credence to his story. One can imagine the enjoyment of the soup from Khlestakov’s speech. From the strong contrast between the speaking st...

Read more

Keywords

2005 219 220 222 228 229 233 255 258 259 261 270 abroad absolut accept action actual ad addit admir advantag affirm allow almost alreadi also alway amount analysi anim anna anoth anxious anyth anywher appar appear aroma arriv articl asid ask aspect attitud audaci audienc avoid awar away back background bad basi be begin believ belong benefit besid better big bit black blast blind bobchinski brag bribe brought build built cannot capit card censur chang charact character characterist childish church citi claim class clear collaps come communic compar comparison complain complic conclud condit confront confus consid content contradict contrari contrast contribut control convey correct corrupt could countri coupl credenc critic dare death deceiv deepli demonstr depict describ descript design destroy determin develop devic diari differ difficulti direct disgrac dispar distanc dobchinski doesn doubt downfal dramat dream dreamt easi easili educ els employ end enjoy enorm enough even eventu everi everyon everyth everywher exagger exampl excit exil exist experi explain explan expos express exterior extraordinari eye face fact fair fake fals familiar fanci far farm feel figur filth firm first flaw flog floweri food foreign forti fragil free frequent function gallop get go god goe gogol got govern group hand happen haven head heaven help high higher hous howev human hyperbol idea ignor illustr imagin immedi import improv includ incompet indirect inefficaci ineffici influenc inn inner insignific inspector instead institut interest iron ironi irrat isol issu judg judgment keep khlestakov kind know knowledg landown languag last lead leader least lend less lid life lifestyl lift like linguist literati live locat long longer look lot lower m made madman make man manag mani marya matter may mayor meet mess meticul metropoli miloslavski miscommun money moral moustach must naiveti natur nervous never new nicolai night nightmar nikolay nobl normal noth novel obvious offici often oh one open opinion order origin otherwis paper2 pari past pay penguin peopl perform person petersburg pigsti play pleas plot polish posit postman prepar present pretend print prison problem process prompt1 propos prove punish purpos put question quit rank rat rather ration reach real realiz reason refin reflect refus religion repeat respect result reveal righteous ronald roubl run russian sarcast satir satisfi say seem select sentenc separ sergeant serv sever shallow short shout show signific simpl simpli situat smirdin social societi someon someth soon soup speak special specif speech spoken st status steamer stick still stori street strong stubborn stuck stupid style subt success sunday superfici supervis suppos symbol system take tast techniqu tell therefor thing think though thought thousand three time town townspeopl tran treat trivial trust tureen turn two ugli univers unpolish use usual varieti various vivid want way week well well-educ whether wilk will window without word work worri would write year yes york yuri