Essays /

12 Angrymen Answers Essay

Essay preview

1 Describe and evaluate how membership—the people in the team—affect dynamics within the team. From the movie “12 Angry Men”, we can we can learn that how leadership can reduce opposite opinions, and align them together to come to a single conclusion.

The first positive move that Fonda’s character made towards integrating opposing views was his overall approach to the current situation. The opposing opinions of the jury members were used to understand differing viewpoints. The basic idea presented in the film was that the having multiple opinions would eventually lead to the best possible solution.

In order to minimize difference of opinions, it is essential to understand that diversity in opinion is chance to come to the best possible solution. If we can handle the different opinions in a right way then we can have a better understanding of the situation. The most creative people in the group probably have the most diverse ideas which will eventually to the best possible solution that which will appeal to most of the individuals.

Indeed diversity has its own challenges. This is because people consider their opinions better than others. This becomes a problem because every group member wants his opinions to have weightage in the conversation. One way to make people with varied viewpoints comfortable and appreciated in the group is by listening to their viewpoints properly. It is because of this process of active listening, that group members with different viewpoints can really develop personal relationships which are really important in a group conversation. This is a mandatory skill for leaders to have and in this movie Fonda uses this behavior. Fonda shows this skill by effective conversation, to understand the feelings of the other jury members.

Needless to say, 12 jury members responsible for life or death of a young boy can be considered a difficult situation as well as the time pressures presented from some members created even more pressure. As a way of reduce this stress, Fonda was clear of his intentions to simply “talk about it”. This dialogue had a way of allowing the jury members to share the stress among each other. How did the personalities, backgrounds, and styles of the jury members affect the internal team dynamics for each of Juror? The only person in the movie who did not truly believe the boy was culprit even though everyone was against him. He expressed his opinions in such a way that everyone in the group has to change its opinion as per him. The importance of information provider is to present facts in order to help in decision making. Joseph Sweeney discussed about the chances that an old man could be false as a witness and also that a woman who had could have a poor eyesight. Jack Klugman had an idea about the usage of knives as he came from a slum background so he provided the information about the angle of the knife. Henry Fonda’s character also plays the role of an information seeker by requesting more information about the case before reaching to a final conclusion. E. G. Marshall was also an information seeker. He was logical and focused on the facts and information which he saw rather than different opinions of the members. J. Cobb and Ed Begley presented their opinions and even their assumptions about the culprit based on his young age and background as an immigrant. Lee J. Cobb and Ed Begley talked a lot but their communication with others which did not work well and ultimately nobody listened to their views. Jack Warden was also an opinion giver. He insisted that the culprit was guilty without any more consideration. On the other hand, Martin Balsam as the jury foreman was an opinion seeker by asking for the opinions of the other members before making a decision. George Voskovec and Henry Fonda provided the information which the team members found and made connections. This approach helped other group members to think more logically. An energizer is responsible for stimulating the group to continue working. Henry Fonda made other members focus on the facts and the other standpoints about the crime throughout the movie by asking related questions. Henry Fonda was both an energizer and an evaluator in the jury. How personality type in groups can affect the group’s performance is shown by the socially related roles in the movie. The group member’s personality affects how much he participates socially in a team discussion within the communication climate. Group ...

Read more


1 10 10th 11 11th 12 12th 1st 2 2nd 3 3rd 4 4th 5 5th 6 60 6th 7 7th 8 8th 9 9th abil abl accent accept account accuraci accus achiev acquaint act activ actual addit advanc advisor advoc affect affirm age agenc aggreg agreeabl ahead aid air align allow alon along also although american amiabl among anger angl angri angrymen anoth answer appar appeal appear appreci approach architect area argument around arriv ask assent assert assign assist assumpt attack attempt attend authent author back background bad balanc bald ball balsam bank base basebal basic becom begin begley behavior behaviour believ benefit best better beyond bias bigot bigotri bill bit bitter blame blameworthi blind block boy bring broker build bulli bunch busi calm came cannot capabl capac case caus challeng chanc chang charact chew choic chosen circumstanti clad claim clash clear clerk clerk/teller climat clownish coach coalit cobb cohes collabor colleagu collect come comfort commit communic communiti complet conceit concentr concern conclus concret condemn condit confirm conflict connect conscious consid consider consist constant construct contempl contend continu contradict contribut control convers convict convinc cool cooper coordin correl cough could count court cover creat creativ crime crisi culprit current deal death decis declin defend defus degre deliber democraci demonstr depend descent describ deserv desir despit detail develop dialog dialogu differ difficult difficulti discont discuss display distract disturb divers doesn dog downpour draw dress dresser driven drop dubious due dull dull-wit duti dwell dynam e eager earli easi easili ed educ effect effici effort either eldest eleven emerg emot employ emul encount encourag end endeavor energ engag enhanc enough ensu entir errand especi essenti establish estrang european evalu even eventu everi everyon evid examin exampl execut exhibit expand experi expertis expos express extrem eyesight face fact factor failur fair fair-mind fals fan fashion father feel fervent fill film final finish first fist fit flinch focus follow fonda footbal forc foreman formal found four frequent frighten frustrat fuse g game garag gate gather general georg german german-european get give giver glass go goal goe good gradual grasp great greater grew group guidelin guilti gum hair hand handl happen happi harlem harmoni hate head hearer heavi help henri hesit high high-school hold homicid hop hospit hostil hot hous human hush huski idea ident identifi immigr impact impati import inadequ incid incorpor incred inde indiffer individu industri inform initi innov insecur insight insist insolv inspir instant instead instig integr intent interact interest intern intoler intricaci introduc introduct introductori involv issu j jack job joseph juda juri juror justic justif keep key killer kind klugman knife knive know knowledg labour last lead leader leadership learn leav led lee legal let level liabl life like listen litig live logic longer lot loud loud-mouth love made main maintain major make man manag mandatori mani manual market marmalad marshal martin may mean meantim mediat meek member membership men mental mention mentor met metaphor method methodolog microsoft mind minim minor minut model moment moreov motion mouth move movi much multipl murder must mysteri naiv nasti natur need needless neighborhood nervous never new night nobodi norm note object oblig observ obsess offer often old older one one-of-a-kind onto onward open opinion opportun oppos opposit order organ organiz other outsid over-shadow overal owner pace painter paper part particip particular partit pass passion patriot pawn penalti peopl per percentag percept perform person perspect persuad phase place play plot point polic poor portion posit possess possibl potenti prejudic presenc present pressur presum prior probabl problem procedur proceed process progress project proof proper propos proud prove provid provision purchas put qualiti question quick quiet racist rang rather re re-ord reach realiz realli reason recal receiv recent recogn recommend reconcil reconsider reduc refer refuge regard regular rehash rejoin relat relationship reliabl reliev repel represent request requir reserv resign resolut respect respond respons restless result resurg resurrect retir return rever revolv right rivalri role room rude rush safeguard salesman saw say school scratch scrutin seat section see seeker seem seen sell sens sensit sentiment serious settl seven shadow shape share shatter shi shield shop show shown shut simmer simpli sincer singl situat skill slum slum-dwel small smug social soft soft-spoken softwar sole solut solv someon son soon speak specif spoken stab stage stakehold stand standard standpoint start state statement step stick stimul stock stockbrok storm straight strategi street stress strong structur studious style subgroup subordin success surpris survey sweeney switch switchblad symbol system tabl tactless take taken talk task taught team techniqu teenag temperament tend tendenc tens test theme theori thin think thirti thirty-four though thought threat throughout throw thrown thus ticket tide time today togeth took toward trade trait transform trial truli trust trust-build turn two type typic ultim unanim uncomfort under understand unfold unfortun union uniqu unlik upbring upon usag use util valid valu vari various vast veng verbal verdict view viewpoint vision voskovec vote wad want warden watchmak way wealthi weapon wear webber weightag well well-dress well-educ whether white white-hair whoever whose wide widest will wimpi window wit within without woman word work worker worldview would wrought yet young