Essays /

12 Th Lecture Essay

Essay preview

Lecture12
Contents of contract

Terms are the contents or subject matter of the contract.
In other words content of a contract is what the parties have agreed upon. While agreeing upon the content a lot of negotiations take place and many statements are made. Do all of them become part of the contract and thus binding on the parties? No. In order to understand the terms of the contract, a distinction needs to be made between the following; •Terms and mere representations.

•Statement of opinions (mere puffs).
•Express terms.
•Implied terms.

Representations
These are statements usually made during the pre-contractual stage and merely induce the parties to enter into a contract. Term
It is a representation either expressly incorporated into a contract or implied by fact or law. Terms are binding obligations which the parties agree to perform in order for the contract to be complete. Terms can be

• Expressly stated and incorporated into the contract by the parties themselves. • Implied factually from the circumstances as being the presumed intention of the parties. • Imputed into the contract by process of law for some other purpose. • Whether a statement has become a term of the contract depends on the intention of the parties.

The court while deciding whether a statement is a term or a representation will look into the following factors. • Whether the maker of the statement advised the other party to verify the truth of his statement • Importance of statement.

• Respective state of knowledge of the parties.

The respective knowledge of the parties

•Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams (1957), it was held that a statement by a member of the public (a non-expert) to a garage (an expert) with regard to the age of a car was a mere representation not a term. • (Dick Bentley Productions Ltd v Harold Smith (Motors) Ltd (1965). •A statement made by a garage (an expert) to a member of the public (a non-expert) concerning the mileage of a car was held to be a term •Importance to the parties

•In Bannerman v White (1861), the buyer stated ‘if sulphur has been ...

Read more

Keywords

100 12 1836 1861 1876 1934 1947 1949 1957 1962 1965 1969 1972 1979 1994 1997 24 3 act addit advanc advis age agre allow also although amount anoth appeal arisen arriv articl assum assur attent author automat b bank bannerman base becom bed benefit bentley bettini bind boat bound breach breakdown bring broken brought busi buy buyer bystand car care cargo case certain charter chess circumst claim classif classifi claus co color commerc common compani compil complet concern conclud condit conduct confid confin consequ consid constitut contain content continu contra contract contractu control correspond could cours court cover credit custom damag day deal decid defend depend depriv descript desk determin develop dick dictat discharg display distinct distinguish drawn due eastern ecay efficaci either employ employe engag enter entitl entri equal essenti establish estrang everi evid examin exampl exclud exclus exempt exhibit expert express expressli fact factor factual fail fair fir first fit five follow form four fulfil furnish furnitur garag general give godfrey goe good graucob ground guardian guest gye hand harold heart held henri hold hollier hong hotel hutton impli import improv imput includ incorpor induc injur innoc insert intend intent intern interpret jetti kaisha kawasaki keep kendal kind kisen know knowledg known kong l laid land law leav lectur lecture12 left less liabil liabl like lilli limit local look loss lost lot ltd machin made main make maker malik manag manageress mani market marlborough matter may member mere mileag mistak month moorcock motor mr mrs much must necessari need negoti neither new nine nomin non non-expert notic oblig obvious occas offici olley one opera opinion oral order ordinari origin oscar other owner park parker parol part parti partial particular perform period place plaintiff plc pond poussard practic pre pre-contractu premis prepar present presum previous price process product proferentem promis properti proprietor provid public puff purchas purport purpos railway rambler reason receiv recept recov refer regard regardless rehears relat relationship relev reli remedi repair represent requir respect respond respons right rise risk river roadworthi role room rule safe sale saw sea season see seek seen sell seller servic seven ship sign signatur similar simpli sing singer six slot smith sold sound south specif spelt spent spier spring stage start state statement statut statutori stolen subject subsidiari substanti sue suggest sulphur survey take tenant term termin test th therefor thought three thus time tort total trade transport treat true trust truth type undermin understand unless unload upon use usual v valid various verif verifi vessel wall want warranti warren way week whether white whole wholli william wish word work would written year éstrang