Essays /

1301 Eng Essay

Essay preview

Essay 1
A Potent Policy Debate
The two articles being discussed are on the topic of drug legalization, having my own opinion, what I’ve done is become completely open minded on the subject and only will judge the argumentative skills of the authors. Organizing it by article, I will review at the end of each analysis if the reader would have swayed my opinion. Judging on the use of ethos, pathos and logos to determine if the two authors give valid argument on Drug Legalization and the effects it would have on society, I will state which author has a higher chance to persuade the reader. Reading into his background you start to learn Mr. Bennett was a Secretary of Education who is strongly against the legalization of drugs in America. His ideas were all based on personal experience or knowledge learned on the job. Never directly attacking the other party he posts firm facts and educated opinions on what would or could happen if drug policy was changed for the opposing party. He says those who think they are smart enough to understand the whole scenario proposing legalization are looking inside and not outside. Working his way through all three major appeals he comes to the end just like the start of the essay. Confidence however could also strike him in the back for being so sure of his beliefs. Having a presence and a resume to prove it, Mr. Bennett builds a firm idea that can be understood, but that is all it is, an idea. Right from the start he belittles those who use drugs (some of which are deemed intellectual) a...

Read more

Keywords

1 1301 633 636 639 655 activist address adequ agre alcohol allow almost alon alreadi also america amount analysi anecdot angl anoth apartheid appeal argu argument articl aspir assum attack audienc author awar away awe back background bare base becom beforehand begin belief believ belittl bennett bit black blueprint brief bring budget build calib callous caus certain chanc chang cheap check children citi clear cocain code combin come commit common complet concis confid confus content continu contradict convert could counter cours crackdown credit crowd crown crucial crystal current daili dealer debat deduc deem delv deni descript determin develop digest direct disagre discredit discuss doesn done door dose drink drug due easi econom educ effect emot emphasi end eng enlist enough essay ethic etho everi evid experi eye face fact fair fallaci far feel fellow field final find firm first fluff forc forgot forth four friedman function futur generat get give glanc go grader grant great ground gruel guid hand handl happen harsh health heartstr heavili higher hope howev humanitarian idea ideal imprison inde indirect inflat influenc inform inner insid instat intellectu introduct isn job judg keyston know knowledg label lack lead leader learn left legal less let level life light like line live logic logist logo look m major make man mandela mani marijuana market matter may method might mind model moral mr much must muster nation natur near necessari negat nelson never nobel non offer one open opinion oppos organ outsid overdon parallel parent part parti past patho pattern peac peopl perfect person persuad pertain piec pioneer piti point polici ponder poor posit post potent power practic prepar preposter presenc prevent prize problem process proclaim promis proper propos prove public publish pull put qualiti question rather ration reach read reader realiti realiz realli reason relat remark represent research resum review revis right role said sampl sarcast say scenario secretari self self-proclaim serious set seven sever share shed shock show shown shut side sign sinc situat sixth sixth-grad skill smart societi sold someth sorri soul sound stand standpoint start state statement stellar still strike strong stronger stun subject succeed success sudden suicid sure sway tactician take target tell term theoret thesi thin thing think thought three time tone topic toward troubl truli trust tug two two-sid unansw understand understood use user valid valu ve view vital want way well whether whole wide winner wisest within work world would wrap yet