Essays /

138 Ni Act Essay

Essay preview

* 1. Critical Study of Dishonour of Cheques UnderNegotiable Instruments Act,1881Introduction:Cheques are very convenient instruments which can be issued to settle payments or obligations in a contractor even to give gifts. Section 138 to 142 are incorporated in Negotiable Instruments Act,1881 with a view toencourage the culture of use of cheques and enhancing the credibility of the instrument. The NI Act makes the drawer of cheque liable for penalties in case of dishonour of cheques due to insufficiency of funds or forthe reason that it exceeds the arrangements made by the drawer. The NI Act also contains sufficient safeguards to protect the drawer of cheques by giving him an opportunity to make good the payment ofdishonoured Cheque when a demand is made by the payee.History of the ACT and objective of amendments:The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was amended by the Banking, Public Financial Institutions andNegotiable Instruments Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988 to insert a new Chapter XVII with Sections 138 to142. These new sections came into force w.e.f 1.4.1989.The Act was further amended in 2002 by inserting Sections 143 to 147 w.e.f 06.02.2003 to deal with certaindeficiencies noticed in the Act. Salient features of amendment are acceptance of Bankers memo of dishonouras prima facie evidence, evidence of witness or accused on affidavit, serving of summons by post/courier forspeedy trial/prosecution, increase of period for issuance of notice by payee and enhancing of punishment.Thus the main thrust of the amendment is to provide for a speedy and time bound trial, punishment of 2 yearsand double the amount of the cheque as fine. Another notable feature is that it provides for compounding ofthe offence.Offence under the NI Act:Offence under Section 138 of the N I Act shall be deemed to have been committed, if the followingconditions are satisfied:a) Cheque must have been drawn by a person(the drawer) in favour of a payee on his bank account formaking payment * 2. b) Such payment must be either in whole or partial discharge of a legally enforceable debtc) Cheque must have been returned by the Banker to the payee or holder in due course due to insufficientbalance in the account of the drawer or it exceeds the arrangement he had with the bank,Proviso requires fulfillment following additional conditions:a) Cheque must be presented within a period of 6 months from the date of cheque or its validity period whichever is earlier.b) The payee or holder in due course must demand payment of the cheque amount by written notice within15 days of receipt of noticec) Such notice must be issued within 30 days from the date of receipt of intimation of dishonour from bankandd) The drawer of cheque fails to pay demanded sum within 15 days from the date of receipt of the noticePunishment for offenceThe punishment provided for the offence u/s 138 is imprisonment for a term which may extend to a maximumperiod of 2 years or with a fine which may extend to a maximum of twice the amount of the cheque or withboth.Let us now shift our fo...

Read more

Keywords

06.02.2003 1 1.4.1989.the 1057 118 1284 138 139 13leads 142 143 1449 147 147divergent 15 1604 1609 177 182.6 1881 1881introduction 1973 1981 1988 1992 1993 1998 1999 1scj 2 2000 2001 2002 2004 2009 22 29 3 30 3043supreme 307 320 3978 4 424 45 482 5 510dealt 6 7 828 954 absolv accept acceptable.if account accru accsu accus achiev acknowledg acomplaint act act.10 act.8 act.g action addit addrese address addresse adopt advis affair affidavit aggarw aid air ajay aliv alka alleg allow alloy allthes also although amend amit amount analysi andnegoti andnot anil anoth another.supreme anr anyon anyth appeal appel appellant/respondent approach area aris arrang asid asnail asth atchandigarh av awardingpunish b balan bank bankandd banker bar becam becom beconvict bedismiss beencommitted.in bena bhadrant bhalla bhaskaran bill ble bound branch burden butcommun c came card case caseof categor caus cement central certain certaindefici chanc chandigarh chapter charg chemic chequ cheque.2 choos churiwala cl clarif claus clear code cogent come commit comp compani complain complaint complaint.it complaints.if complet complianc compliant compound compromis conclud condit confer confus consid consider consist contain contend content contractor contrari control controversi conveni convict corpn corporationown correct cours court court.3 courtin courtreiter cr credibl credit crimin critic crpc cultur date datedchequ day daybasi deal debt debt.section debtc decid decis deem default.7 defeat defens defici delhi delhicourt demand demandingpay deposit deriv desir develop direct directedfor director discharg dishnour dishonest dishonor dishonored.the dishonour dishonoura dismiss dispos done doubl draw drawe drawer drawn due earlier.b easier either elabor electron enforc engin enhanc envisag equal erron especi evaderand even everi evid examin examinedfrom exceed exchang exemptedfrom exim existed.1 expediti expiri expiryof express extend face faci fact factor fail failur favour fax featur file fill financi fine firm.keeping focus follow followingcondit followingday forc forfil formak forspeedi forth fresh fulfil fund gift give good govern ground gulshan gupta hadjurisdict harcharan haritw harman head held help high highcourt hisaccount holder hon howev immedi impli import impos imprison in-charg includ incorpor increas india indian indiffer infer inform ingot initi inquir insadanandan insert institut instruct instrument insuffici insufficientbal interest interpret inth intim introduct isdesir isequ isissu issu issuanc iswel itprevi j jagdish joint judgement judgementspav judgment judgmentof jurisdict justic k kn knowledg kuchikumar kumar kusum law lead legal liabil liability.5 liabl limit limitation.so limitedsourc lj local looksaft lot lower ltd m/s made madhavan main make manag mani manner matter maximum maximumperiod may mean medchal memo mention mere mitig mmtc modi money moneyoccur monitor month move ms muniyappan murthi must n nagabasavanna name nandi nation need negoti negotiableinstru neither new ni nomine normal notabl notb notic noticec noticepunish notwithstand number object oblig occas ocl of1974 ofchequ ofdishonour offenc offence.conclusion offence.judgments offence.offence offenceshal offenceth offic ofsuman often ofth omiss omnibus ondemand one onearea onhim onth onus opin opportun orcommiss ordinarili orsair otherword out4 overrul p pace panason part parti partial partnership patterson pay payabl paye payee.history payment paywithin penalti pend pennar peopl per period period.if permit person petit petition.in pharma place point possibl post post/courier postdat prayer preclud prematur present presum presumpt prima procedur proceed proper prosecut protect prove provid proviso public punish punishment.thus purpos pvt quash rai rajneesh raochief reason rebut receipt receiptcan receiv reckon recoveryof refer refus regist reiter relev relianc remain rememb requir requirementtherefor resid respond return right rise risk rule run safeguard said salient sankaran satisfi sawhney say sc sc2895 scc section section141 section178 secunderabad secur send sent sentenc serv servic serviceof set sethi settl sever shall shift shivrani show shownon sica sica.9 sick sil silent silkexport simpli sinc singh situat six speedi state stipul stop stoppag studi subsequ success suffici sum summon sunil suppos suprem suspend taken technolog technologist term termsand thatonc theappel thechequ thedraw theliabl thepaye therebi therefor thereto threshold thrust tick till time to142 toencourag tolow trade transfer transmit tri trial trial/prosecution tryth twice u/s u/s138 unclaim undernegoti unless us usa use usual v v.natthu vagu vaidyaa valid various view vs w.e.f way whereoff whereverambigu whichev whole whose wit withboth.let withconcaten within within15 word would written writtenon xvii year yearsand