Essays /

15626 Relevance Of Student Mobility Sum Essay

Essay preview

Finnish employers’ views on benefits of studying and work placements abroad
English summary
Irma Garam, Centre for International Mobility CIMO

This paper presents the English summary of a study project conducted by the Centre for Interntional Mobility CIMO. The study examined the relevance of international student mobility from the point of view of employers. The report was published in Finnish in November 2005 and it is available on CIMO’s website at Opiskelijoiden kansainvälinen liikkuvuus ja työelämä. Työnantajien näkemyksiä ulkomailla opiskelun ja harjoittelun merkityksestä Occasional Paper 1/2005.

Aim and background of the study

International study and work placement experiences have
usually been studied by surveying mobile students. Less attention has been paid to employers’ perspective. The main benefits of international mobility according to students relate to improved language skills, learning about new cultures and personal growth and development. The improved language

skills and general key skills, such as social skills, confidence and independence that develop abroad are also regarded as
useful with regard to future employment. According to European surveys, graduates believe that studying abroad has helped them secure their first job. Having international experience during studies often has an impact on the direction of the graduates’ career path, too: for many who have studied abroad, international dimension is one criterion for choosing a job, and they use their language skills and knowledge of different cultures in their jobs.

The subject of this study is the relevance of international
student mobility in relation to work and employment. The
aim is to look for answers to questions, such as whether international experience during studies is useful with regard to employment and whether it bears relevance with regard to
recruitment of new graduates. The survey looks at the issue
from the perspective of employers: How do Finnish employers view studies and work placements abroad? How does international experience rate when recruiting new graduates? Do employers feel that they can benefit from graduates’ international experience? By the concept of relevance we refer here to how useful international student mobility is and how well it serves a purpose. The concept of relevance can be looked at through needs

and expectations. Does the end result of mobility meet the
needs of different players? This survey is limited to the extent to which international student mobility meets the needs of employers. Employers’ perspective is justified since it is them who make micro-level decisions on what kind of knowhow, education and experience is considered valuable when recruiting new graduates.

By international student mobility in this context we mean
a study or work period abroad linked to students’ formal
education and degree: exchange studies, international work
placements or degree studies abroad. Common to all these
three options is that regardless of whether the period takes place in an educational institution or at work, it brings a new, international dimension to the learning process. The survey is limited to higher education.


International dimension has been one of the priorities of
Finnish higher education policy since the 1980s. There has
been a strong focus, in particular, on developing student mobility although internationalisation of higher education is a much wider concept. The current national development plan
for higher education sets out to increase the number of exchange students by about 70% compared to the present level. International student mobility is also one of the criteria used in allocating performance-based funding to higher education


The following industries were the most common among respondents: •
social and health care (19% of respondents);

education (14%);

manufacturing (13%);

retail, hotel and restaurant services (11%);

legal and security sectors (11%);

general public administration (national) (11%);

technology and construction (10%);

banking and finance (6%).

International cooperation and mobility in education has
been justified by, for example, economic competitiveness.
The belief that Finnish economy and business and industry
need highly educated employees with international skills is
common in public declarations. This study tackles the issue
whether Finnish employers share this view.

Employers with a high number of employees are slightly
overrepresented in the results. 16% of respondents employ
less than 10 people and just under a half (46%) less than 50 people. More than every tenth of respondents (12%) represent work places with more than 250 employees. Employees with a higher education degree account, on average, for 27%

of all staff.

Realisation of the study
According to responses received, more than a half of the
work places (57%) are involved in international activities and almost a half (49%) regularly use other working languages
than Finnish or Swedish, the official langua...

Read more


0 000 1 1/2005 10 100 103 105 11 111 12 13 14 15 15626 16 17 171 180 19 1980s 2 20 2004 2005 21 22 23 25 250 27 28 3 30 32 329 34 35 36 37 38 39 4 40 41 44 45 46 48 49 492 5 50 500 53 56 57 6 60 67 677 68 680 687 688 693 7 70 716 73 80 83 9 90 91 93 abil abl abroad academ accord account across act activ adapt addit administr administra advantag advis affect aim albeit alloc almost alreadi also although ambit among amount analyt and/or anoth answer apart appli applic architectur area ask assess attent attitud author autumn avail averag b background bank base basi basic bear behalf belief believ benefit best better biggest bore bring broaden broader brought busi c came camp cannot care career case caution centr chang characterist choos cimo clear colleagu collect common communic compani compar comparison compet competit complement concept concret conditioin conduct confid conscienti consid construct consult contact content context contrast cooper correl correspond could countri courag cours cover criteria criterion cult cultur current custom d data decis decision-mak declar defin degre department depend describ design destin detail develop diff differ difficult dimens direct disadvantag discuss divid divis domest doubt e e.g earlier easili econom economi edg educ either element empathi emphasi employ employe enabl end english enough ensur environ equal equival especi essenti etc european even everi evid examin exampl exchang exclud exot expect experi explain export extens extent extra face face-to-fac familiar feel fewer field fill financ find finland finnish first fit five focus follow food foreign forgotten form formal fund furthermor futur gain garam gave general generic get give given good graduat graph great growth half hand handl harder harjoittelun health heard held help helsinki high higher his/her host hotel hour howev human imaginari immigr impact import improv inabl includ increas independ indic industri inform initi instead institut integr interact interest intern internationalis internt interpret interview interviewe involv irma issu ja job judg justifi kansainvälinen key kind know know-how knowhow knowledg known languag last law learn least leav legal less level lie life liikkuvuus limit link list littl local long look lot low made main major make manag manageri mani manifest manufactur materi may mean media meet men mention merkityksestä metal method metropolitan micro micro-level mind mobil motiv move much multicultur must n nation national-level necessari necessarili need network new newli nine normal note novemb number näkemyksiä obtain occasion occup occupation-specif offer offic offici often one open open-mind oper opiskelijoiden opiskelun opportun option order ordinari organ orient outsid over-educ overal overrepres p paid paper part particular partner path peopl perform performance-bas period persever person perspect phone place placement plan player point polici posit practic prefer prerequisit present prioriti privat probabl problem problem-solv process produc product profil project proport prove provid public publish purpos qualiti question questionnair quick quit rarer rate rather reaction read readi readili realis receiv recruit refer reflect regard regardless regist regular relat relev reliabl remain report repres requir research resourc respond respons restaur restless result retail return reveal rule run search second section sector secur see seem seen select sell send sens sent serv servic set settl share show side sign signific similar sinc situat skill slight small smallest social societi softer solv someth sometim sooner special specialist specif speedi spent spring staff statist stay stress strong student studi subject sum summari suppli survey swedish systemat tabl tackl take taken talk task teach technic technolog ten tend tenth term themat theme thing think third though thought three time tion titl toler total tourism train travel turn twelv two type typic työelämä työnantajien ulkomailla unclear unconnect understand undivid unit unmotiv us use usual valu valuabl vari versa vice view voic vs way websit well went western wherea whether whole whose widen wider within women word work worker worth wrong year young