Essays /

1602 Defamation Elements Of Defamation Per Se Essay

Essay preview

16.02 DEFAMATION — ELEMENTS OF DEFAMATION PER SE WHERE PLAINTIFF IS PUBLIC FIGURE OR STATEMENT RELATES TO ISSUE OF PUBLIC INTEREST OR CONCERN

In this case, the plaintiff claims that the defendant harmed the plaintiff's reputation by making a false statement about the plaintiff. To establish this claim, the plaintiff must prove five elements. The plaintiff must prove that each of the following four elements is more likely true than not true:

(1) the defendant made the following statement: [insert statement determined by the court to be defamatory per se];

(2) the defendant communicated the statement to a person other than the plaintiff;

(3) the statement was reasonably understood by this person to be about the plaintiff; and

(4) the statement was false.

The fifth element of this claim requires the plaintiff to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant either knew that the statement was false or had serious doubts about the truth of the statement.

An alleged fact is established by clear and convincing evidence if the evidence leads you to believe that the alleged fact is highly probable. It is not necessary that the alleged fact be certainly true, or true beyond a reasonable doubt, or conclusively true. However, it is not enough to show that the alleged fact is more likely true than not true. If the plaintiff fails to prove any one of these elements, you must find for the defendant on this claim.

If th...

Read more

Keywords

-19 -34 -38 -74 1 1097 1137 117 12 123 130 15 16.02 16.04 16.07 16.10 1602 166 171 18 190 194 1962 1983 1995 1996 2 20 2000 2005 2007 288 295 3 33 376 4 409 569 570 674 745 829 837 838 891 911 999 abus action actual address alaska alleg allow also although anoth appear approach award b believ beyond borough bracket busi case categori certain character circumst citi claim clear co comment common communic concern conclus conduct consequ consid consider constitut content convinc court crime crimin d damag decid decis deem defam defamatori defend defin definit depart design determin direct discuss diseas disput distinguish dobb doubt either element elimin empir enough enterpris entertain er error establish event evid face fact fail fairbank fairco fall fals fault fifth figur figure/public find five follow found four french given govern harm hay headlin high hold hospit howev id inc injur injuri insert instanc instruct intend interest interpret involv issu jadon juneau juri knew laintiff last law lead least liabil libel like loathsom lowel macdonald made make malic matter may meant memori misconduct mt must n natur necessari newspap note odom olivit one oral p p.2d p.3d paragraph per permit person phrase pitka plaintiff present presum prevent privileg probabl proof prove provid public publish quod reason recogn recov recoveri refer reflect relat repeat reput requir respect restat rice rigg said se second see serious sexual show slander special specif standard statebank statement subsequ suffici support suscept tendenc term three tort trade tradit trial true truth unambigu understood undisput unless use v whether within without word write written