Essays /

Title Canadian Parliamentary System Responsible Government Essay

Essay preview

Essay was written on the question:

Choose and defend one of the following forms of government as being superior:

the liberal form of government of the American presidential system, or

the responsible form of government of the Canadian parliamentary system.

I believe that the Canadian system of responsible, parliamentary democracy is more effective than the American system of liberal, presidential democracy. The Canadian system is better suited to allow the people to express their wishes. The American system is highly convoluted with its system of checks and balances of power. The biggest difference between the American and Canadian governments is the way in which the executive governs. Although the theory of the American system seems well structured to express the will of the people, the wide distribution of power in the United States Government means that there is not enough power held by any one branch of government to ensure that political deadlocks do not occur. In Canada, the executive has much more power to legislate. This power is effectively balanced by the executive's responsibility to the Canadian people, through the House of Commons, and the power the people retain to execute a change in government if that power is used abusively or in a way that disagrees with a majority of Canadian citizens. Thus, it is wise for democracies to emphasize the principles of responsible government.

In Canada, the Governor General is technically the head of state while the prime minister is the head of government. However, the Governor General is merely symbolic; the prime minister directs the government and the country. To quote the assignment booklet, "The Canadian system is more effective in expressing the will of the people by allowing government (especially majority government) to govern with relatively fewer checks or hindrance from balancing power." In Canada, the executive branch of the government participa...

Read more


100 105 18 1957 1960s 1988 24 3.5 301 435 5 60 75 abil abl abus accept accord account action adequ affect age agreement allow almost also alter although amend america american amount anoth appeal appoint approv assign assum attempt author averag balanc becom believ benefit better biggest bill book booklet branch budget budgetari cabinet call campaign canada canada-unit canadian cannot case chang check chief choic choos citizen civil clear close common comparison compens confid congress consecut constitut control convolut could counter counter-balanc countri cours court creat creation deadlock debat deceas decid defend delay democraci deni depend design determin die differ direct disagre disciplin dissolv distribut done easi effect either elect emphas end enforc enough ensur especi essay everi excess exclus execut exemplifi exercis expel express extens extrem fact factor fewer filibust final fit follow form free function fund gain general give go govern government governor great greater gridlock guarante hand happen hard head held help high hindranc hold hour hous howev immedi impair implement import independ influenc instabl interf intern introduc involv issu judici judiciari justic justifi lament last late law legal legendari legisl legislatur less liber like limit littl long low main major make matter may mean mechan member mere middl mind minist minut miss money much must new nixon nowaday number occur occurr offic often one one-third oper opportun parallel parliament parliamentari parti particip particular pass patronag peopl per physic piec polit popul posit possess power practic presid presidenti prevent prime principl problem process propos provinc put question quick quot read reason recent record refus reject relat relay relev repres represent requir resign resort respons rest result retain right rule run seat see seek seem senat separ seri serv servic session sever show similar simpl six smoother speak speech spend spoke stabil stall start state still strike strom struck structur subject submit suffer suit superior suppli suprem symbol system tabl tactic take technic telephon term theoret theori therefor thing third three thurmond thus time titl topic trade treasuri two unanim unit unless use veto vote way well whatsoev wide wise wish work written year