Essays /

A Critical Evaluation Of British Government Essay

Essay preview

A critical evaluation of British government policy in addressing health inequalities since 1997. Shortly after taking office in 1997 the Labour Government commissioned a study to examine inequalities in health of the UK nation. The resulting finding where published in The Acheson report (Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health, 1998), the report made a number of recommendations based upon evidence and set priority areas of health inequalities to be tackled. Unfortunately however, the Report failed to provide costing for these recommendations. The report placed great weight behind recommendations such as; Health Impact Assessment, if a policy would have an impact on health it should be measured and judged in regard to its effect on health inequalities, if possible it should lean towards the lowest social class wherever possible to reduce inequalities. The highest priority should be those policies aimed at young children, expectant mothers and women of childbearing age, policies which closed the gap on income inequalities and households on state benefits. Further policy areas included, education, employment, housing and environment, mobility and nutrition (Acheson, 1998). Achesons aim with his recommendations was to raise the level up for worst off, the report found health inequalities at that time where excessive and unwanted i.e. life expectancy was up but not healthy life expectancy and life expectancy was rising more for higher social classes, mortality rates were falling, premature mortality from major causes were higher in lower social classes, infant mortality was decreasing but the class divide was not, greater alcohol and drug dependence was found in lower social class men and average incomes had risen but had risen much more for top per cent of the population than for bottom per cent of the population (Lowdell et al, 1999). The DoHs green paper ‘Our Healthier Nation’ (DoH, 1998c) aimed to improve the health of the nation and focused on improving the health of the lowest social classes in society. It brought together government, public agencies and the public to form a ‘Contract for Health’, which targeted heart disease and stroke, mental health, accidents and cancer. The DoHs white paper ‘Saving Lives our Healthier Nation’ (1999a) provided a strategy to implement this, it stressed the need that health inequalities should be reduced and confirmed the targets suggested in the green paper (DoH, 1998b) but disappointingly failed to set targets for health inequalities. The DoHs ‘Action Report’ (DoH, 1999b) whilst accepting the Acheson Reports finding it also referred to policies for a fairer society by constructing healthy communities, it set about to reduce the death rates in people under 75 by at least a fifth for cancer, coronary heart disease and stroke. It aimed to reduce accidents by at least a fifth, serious injury by at least a tenth and tackling mental illness by reducing death rates from suicide by at least a fifth by 2010. To help achieve these targets and to overcome the lack of costing provided by the Acheson Report £21 bill...

Read more

Keywords

-07 -11 -1997 -2000 -2006 -2008 -4 -7 -8 -99 /prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4139025.pdf 0.5 10 1000 14 16 19 1995 1997 1998 1998a 1998b 1998c 1999 1999a 1999b 2000 2001 2001b 2002 2002a 2002c 2003 2004 2005 2006 2006a 2007 2007a 2008 2008f 2009 2009c 2009f 2010 2010b 2011 2012 21 25 2nd 4.7 5.6 5.8 6.6 7 7.7 75 accept access accid acheson achiev acknowledg across action activ address adequ adopt adult affect age agenc agreement aim al alcohol alloc allow along also although amongst announc anti anti-discrimin approach area argu assess asthana audit author avail averag back baggott bardsley barrier base baselin basingstok becam behind benefit ber berkshir best bibliographi big billion birth bisexu blane board bodi bolsov bottom break bring bristol britain british brought budget c call cameron cancer capabl care carri caus cent centr chair challeng chang chapter charit child childbear children choos cite citizen claim class clear close commiss commit communiti compar concern conclud condit confirm conserv consid consider constant construct consult contain continu contract contribut control coronari cost could counti coverag creat critic cropper cross cross-cut current cut d dealt death decis decreas dedic defin definit defra deliveri den depart depend depriv derbyshir desir despit determin develop dfes diet differ difficult direct director disabl disadvantag disappoint discrimin diseas divid doh done dorl dowler drug dtlr duti dwp e earli econom economi edn educ effect effort emphasi emphasis employ enabl engag england enough ensur environ equal et ethnic evalu even everi evid examin excess exercis expans expect expenditur expert extra exworthi factsheet fail fair fairer fall fallen famili februari fell field fifth figur find focus focuss form forward found four full fund fundament futur gain gap gay general geograph give given go goe good govern gradient graham great greater green group grown growth h halliday haz health health-report healthi healthier heart help high higher highest hit hm hmso hous household howev huge hypertens i.e idea identif identifi ill im impact implement implic impos imposs improv inact includ incom increas independ indic individu inequ inequalities.3rd infant initi injuri inquiri instead intens intervent introduc involv judg justic key knowsley labour lack larg later lean least legisl lesbian less level life lifestyl like limit line link list live local london long look low lowdel lower lowest m macmillan made main mainstream major make manag manual map march market marmot massag materi matter maxim measur mechan meet men mental minist mobil model modifi moral morgan mortal mother move movement much multi multi-ag n name narrow nation need new nhs non non-spearhead number nutrit obes object offer offic one onlin open opportun outcom overcom palgrav paper parliament parti particular patient pct pcts peak peopl per persist physic place plan pledg polici polit pool poor poorest popul posit possibl post poverti practic predomin prematur press prevent previous primari prime prioriti privat privatis problem process professor program programm programmes/policies progress project promis promot proportion protect provid public publish r rais rate reason recognis recommend redistribut reduc refer regard relationship relev reli report resourc respons rest result review revis right rise risen role routin sampson save scale seat see seen serious servic set sever shift short short-term show similar sinc six skill slow smoke social societi socio socio-econom socioeconom solut spearhead specif spectrum spencer spend standard start state still strateg strategi strengthen stress stroke structur stuart studi sudden suffer suggest suicid suit summari support sure sustain system tackl take target task tax tenth term theme therefor thing think though thought thus time togeth took top toward train transgend treasuri treasury/doh treatment trend trust uk uncompl under unequ unfortun univers unwant uphold upon van virtual voluntari wait walk walk-in way wealth wealthi weight well wellbeing.university wherev whilst white whole widen wider without women work worst would www.dh.gov.uk www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4139025.pdf year young zone