Government and Ethics
Ethics is the study of what is right and what is wrong. In our daily lives were continuously forced to make simple and important decisions. Ethics help to guide people’s behavior and assist them in coming to conclusions. There is not an exact rule to what is morally correct because some people view things differently but by having a general since of what is ethically appropriate it can help a society function in a civilized manner. The role of government in ethics, and the role of ethics in government are very important concepts in forming that civilized society.

In a society there are laws and there are ethics; however there is a considerable difference between the two you cannot have one without the other. Laws are what the government determines right and wrong. Ethics are what the majority of society determines as appropriate. The laws of a society can only state what a person can and cannot do. But they do not cover the in between. Ethics cover the gray areas and indicate what is accepted in a society. Ethics are personal laws they help people make the choice between what is morally right and wrong. Morals help to make a society more civilized and stable. Even though there is a strong distinction between ethics and laws you cannot have one without the other. Laws are not possible without ethics. In the textbook Thinking Critical about Ethical Issues author Ruggiero states, “The only way for a law to be enacted or repealed is for one or more people to make a decision about right and wrong. That has always been true, whether the lawmaker was the chieftain of a nomadic band or tribe, a king or queen, or a group of elected officials” (Ruggerio, 2008). To determine what is unlawful lawmakers need determine what is moral or immoral. The majority of people in a society determine ethical values. But the idea of majority rule can be very dangerous when determining what is ethically correct. In many cases the majority does not specifically base their decision based on what is morally right or wrong. So in return the majority’s choice is not always perfect, and in many cases can be very ignorant. In a lot of occasions the majority rule often equals mob rule. People often forget to determine what is morally sound for the masses and instead determine what is right for them. Majority rule can also influence lawmakers. Laws are dete...

/%7embernste/tae.ethics&law.herrera.html 1978 2004 2006 2008 2010 26 abl accept act action affect age agenc alreadi also alter altern alway amount analyz andrew anoth answer antholi appli appoint appropri area ask aspect assist author avoid awar band barbra base be begin behav behavior believ besid best better branch broad brook brotherhood burden c ca cannot case catto caus centuri certain chang chieftain choic citizen civil clear clear-cut come communiti con concept conclus conflict connect conscienc consequ consid consider consult contain continu correct countri cover creat creativ critic crucial cultur cut d d.c daili danger deal decid decis declar deem defin deliber demand desir determin differ difficult distinct diverg done dubrin durbin effect elect employ employe enact end england ensur equal especi establish ethic evalu even everi everyon exact exampl execut exercis exist expect f.m face fail fair famili fast feel fifteenth final financ find first fix follow forc forget form forward four friend fulfil fulli function general give given global go goe good govern government gray greater group guarante guid hand happen happi help herrera high high-qual hill histor hold howev hudson human humanist hurt idea ignor immor imper implement import indic individu influenc inform infring instanc instead institut insur interest involv issu j jeremi jersi king larg launch law lawmak leader life like littl live lobbyist london longer longer-term look lot made major make mani manner mass may mayb mcgraw mclean meet might minor mob montclair moral much must nation necessarili need negat new nomad oblig occas octob offic offici often one opposit option order other p.d part pass past peopl perfect person place polit poll poor portray pose posit possibl preach press prevent previous problem process proper pros protect prove psycholog put qualiti queen question readi real refer reflect relat repeal repres resolut resolv respons restrict result retriev return right role root royal ruggerio ruggiero rule ryan santa say scandal search second see sens serv similar simpl sinc situat slaveri societi sole solut solv someth sometim sound specif spirit stabl stand start state step still stop strengthen strobe strong studi subdivis suit sure take taken talbott term textbook thing think though thought time toward tri tribe trickl true truli trust two under understand unit univers unlaw upper us valu view vincent vote voter warm washington waterg way weak weigh weight well whether whole william wiser within without won work world would write wrong www-hsc.usc.edu www-hsc.usc.edu/%7embernste/tae.ethics&law.herrera.html york