Essays /

Can We Live With A Nuclear Essay

Essay preview

Iran’s Nuclear Ambitions

Can We Live with a Nuclear Iran?

Amyn Jivani


POL1102 D – Politics and Globalization

Professor: Dr Daniel Pierre-Antoine

Moderator: Dr Daniel Pierre-Antoine

War has commenced since the late 1800’s with over 150 conflicts and 600 battles occurring, and still taking place on a global perspective. People who witness war firsthand tend to feel that the most memorable moments are the moments that people wish to remember the least. The dilemma faced in society currently is the idea of Iran having the capability of possessing a nuclear weapon. Doing so will make them the tenth nuclear power in the world, adding them to a list involving; The United States, Russia, United Kingdoms, France, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, and Israel . The major focus of today’s discussion is on Iran’s pronouncement to go nuclear. The first half of this paper will attempt to depict the pros for Iran receiving a nuke, and the cons of receiving a nuke. This will enable us to gain a non-biased view on the situation in Iran. The second half of this paper will summarize why ‘we’ cannot live with a nuclear Iran. The core purpose for acquiring nuclear weapons in a society is not to cause violence, but rather deter violence, which is a viable fit to any country using it for those specific purposes. This fact is proven by all the countries that already possess nuclear weapons. These weapons are utilized the same way that bouncers are used at clubs. To secure the vicinity and keep unwanted people out. Keeping this in mind, we must take into consideration the Non-Proliferation Treaty aka NPT. The NPT acts as a repellent of nuclear technology to countries as its primal objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and technology and to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of energy. With these restrictions, only 5 states were recognized as nuclear weapons from the 190 parties that were involved in the NPT. The United States, Russia, United Kingdoms, France, and China all possessed nuclear weapons, and are also the 5 permanent members of the United Nations Security Council. The controversy with trying to restrict Iran’s Nuclear Weapons development can be rewarded to the 4 non-parties that have alre...

Read more


.. 10th 150 1800 190 1980 2 4 5 600 6099660 abl accomplish acknowledg acquir act action activ ad add agenc agit air airstrik aka ali allianc allow alreadi also ambit american amyn analyz anna antoin anyon appear arabia argument arm around associ assum atom attack attempt avoid back barack base battl behind bias bibliographi blame blow bodi bomb border bouncer break broken brown build bulgaria bulli bus bush came canadian cannot capabl carri case casualti caus cbc chanc chang chemic children china civilian claim clear club come command commenc commit competit complet con concentr conflict conjur connect consid consider constant contain continu controversi convent cooper core cost could council count countri creat creation credibl current d danger daniel dare deal decid declar definit democrat demonstr depict depth destruct deter determin deterr develop dictat didn dilemma diplomat direct disarm discuss disregard dissip distress doc doesn downfal dr drawn due east economi effect effort egypt employ enabl encourag end enemi energi engorg enrich entertain equip escal even event everi everybodi everyon exampl expens expir explain extent face facil fact factor fail fals fanat far farfetch fatwa feel first firsthand fit focus forc forget founder franc fulli fundament gain gaza general genocid get give global go goe govern greater greatest ground half harder henc hidden hit hold home homeland human hussein iaea idea ideolog iii imag immens implement includ increas india indulg inevit instrument interest intern invad involv iran iranian iraq islam isra israel jivani join keep khameini khomeini kid kingdom korea kudish lack largest late lead leader least leav lebanon let like list liter littl live local locat look lost lot loui made magazin main major make mandatori mani maria mass massiv masur materi matter may mean mechan media member memor middl might mind minor mobil moder moment month movement much must nation natur necessari need neighbour never new news next nightmar non non-bias non-parti non-prolifer north npt nuclear nuclear-arm nuke nullifi number obama object oblig obsess obtain occupi occur offic one ongo open oper opportun oppos option p pakistan paper paralyz parti pay peac peopl percent perfect perman persist person perspect pierr pierre-antoin place plan plausibl pol1102 polici polit popul pose posit poss possess possibl potenti power presid pressur prevent previous price primal problem professor program progress prolifer promot pronounc pros protect proven provid purpos pursuit push put radio rate rather realist realli receiv recogn record regardless regim relationship releas religi rememb repel republ requir resist resolut resourc respons restrict result retali reward right rise risk ruhollah russia saddam safe safeti saudi say sceptic second secur see seem sens serv set setback shouldn side signific sin sinc situat slimmest smaller smarter societi soldier someth specif sport spread start state still stop strangl strategi strike success suitabl summar suprem surround suspend syria tactic take taliban technolog tehran tend tenth term terribl terror terrorist though threat threaten tibet time today toppl tourist toward transport treati tremonti tri turkey turn tv u.s ultim umbrella un unabl undergo underground undermin unit unrest unsecur unstabl unwant upris uranium us use useless util valid vehicl viabl vicin view violenc want war washington way weak weapon wish wit within without wonder work world worth would wouldn year yes