Essays /

Can We Make Our Own Ethical Essay

Essay preview

Can We Make Our Own Ethical Code? A Book Review of Ethics for the Real World ROBERTO G MANAOIS

Submitted to : Dr Dennis Gonzales Business Ethics Ateneo Graduate School of Business MBA Regis Program

Ethics for the Real World: Creating a Personal Code to Guide Decisions in Work and Life by Howard and Korver proposes the drafting of a personalized code of ethics as a basis for ethical decision making in one’s work and life. The book introduces the reader to the need to be conscious about the real life encounters and issues of individuals who desire to learn, understand and practice ethical decisionmaking. They could turn out to be major obstacles resulting in compromises in ethical and moral principles and decisions; as well as transcend all demographics and classes of society in any community. A good start in learning the skill of smart decision making is to unlearn the bad habits and act from desensitized to a sensitized conscience. These ethical detriments are generally categorized as deception, stealing and harming. Of the different forms of deception, lying is identified as the most rampant. This behavioural pathology permeates not only the mind but the whole being of a person. When it has become part of habit, it can be carried on to adulthood making the pathology more dangerous and its negative influence in the society could spread like a metastasized cancer. Stealing and harming both result in exercising abuse of opportunity and power at the expense of other people’s rights. Whatever the magnitude, nature or intent of these compromises, and however people try to shut their eyes from its true colour and formulate self-gratifying justifications for these ethical compromises, the authors explicitly indicated that the resulting consequences far outweigh the benefits from the costs.

The book further proposes that a necessary step to making clear choices for ethical decision making is to understand the similarity or difference in key concepts that are closely related to ethics. These key concepts are: positive and negative ethics, action-based and consequence-based ethics and ethical reasoning and rationalization, and understanding prudential, legal and ethical dimensions of actions. When choosing a response for an ethically confounded encounter, considering the contrasts among these concepts will help build a stronger reflexive skill and a more mature insight in response to a moral dilemma. This is because these distinctions have the tendency to overlap and might confuse rather than clarify ethical issues. By constantly applying and learning these principles we begin to see through a dark glass closely and will be surprised how practical and very clearly confounding issues would give way to a distinct ethical choice. According to Howard and Korver, our experiences, environment and upbringing have exposed us to different principles and values influencing our capability to judge ethically in varied and complex ways. This mixture of influences and principles formed what the authors call “touchstones” or standards that we now use to judge whether something is right or wrong. The challenge is to make an in-depth search of all principles that we know and identify which of these principles are significantly unique and important to us. These will be the foundation of forming the ethical code that we will call our own. These influences come from our religious, secular and work exposures. The authors advocate that the writing of the personal ethical code be done in three steps: the drafting, testing of the standards, and finally the refining of the code. The focus of drafting is on the three common transgressions: deceiving, stealing and harming, with exceptional situations considered. Testing the standards involves checking the logic and focus and test-driving its usefulness. Finally, to refine the code we need to clarify degrees of separation to what is ethical or unethical, draw sharper lines for our positive ethics and consider ethical hierarchy.

After considering all these, bottom line is now choosing the action by going through a decision making process. The authors propose the steps of clarifying ethical issues, creating alternatives and eventually evaluating them. The main point is, if we could discipline ourselves in applying these approaches and principles with focus to ethical dilem...

Read more

Keywords

-17 1 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1971 1973 1986 2 20 2003 2006 2008 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 275 28 29 3 30 31 4 5 54 58 6 6th 7 8 82 87 9 abl absolut abus accept accord account accur across act action action-bas activ adulthood advoc advocaci affect age ago agsb algorithm also altern although alway amidst among ancient anoth answer anymor anyon appli applic approach apt aren articl assert assum assumpt ateneo attest attitud authent author authorit awar award bad ban banal bancroft base basi bc be becom begin behav behaviour belief beliefs-no believ ben benefit best bestsel better bewar bias bibl biblic bibliolog blame blatant bold bonifacio bonifacio-ira book bottom brave build busi c.i ca.390 call cancer cannot canon capabl care carri case categor certain challeng chanc chang chapter charact charg check chemic choic choos christian circumst citizen civil claim clarifi clash class clear cleft clerk clinton close code collect colour comb combin come comment common communiti compani compar compel complet complex compos comprehens compromis concept conclus concret conduct confound confus conscienc conscious consequ consequence-bas consequenti consid consider constant constitut consult context contrast converg cor correct correl corrupt cost could countless cours creat creation critic critiqu cultur customari d danger dark dead deceit deceiv decept decid decis decisionmak declar defin definit degre demograph denni deprav depth describ desensit deserv design desir desper detail determin detriment devalu develop devil dictum differ difficult dilemma dimens discern disciplin discuss dismiss distinct distinguish diverg divers divin doctrin dogma done dr draft draw drive due duti ed educ effect effici element els emeri emot encount enough entitl environ equal essenti ethic evad evalu even eventu everi everybodi everyon evid evil except exercis exhaust exist expect expens experi experienc explicit expos exposur extend extract extraordinarili extrem eye face fact fall fals far favour feel filipino final find finit firm focus follow foot forc form formul foundat full fundament furnish g gather general german giant give given glass go god gonzal gonzalez good govern graduat gratifi greater group guid guidanc h habit hand happier harm harvard head heard heart help heroism hierarchi high hold holi howard howev human i.e ibid idea ideal identif identifi iii illustr imparti implement import improv in-depth inact incomplet indic individu infinit inflict influenc inher insensit insight inspir instruct insuffici intellectu intellig intent interest intrins introduc inventori investig involv ira irrespons issu jame jeremiah journal judg justic justif jvo keep key kjv know korver l label languag lawsuit learn least lectur legal lesson lie life lifetim light like line list littl live logic look loophol loyalti lune made magnitud main major make man manaoi mani manifest manuel manuscript massachussett matter matur may mayb mba mba-regi mean mention messag metastas might mind minimum mixtur model moral motiv move much must nation natur necess necessari necessarili need negat neither new norm note obstacl offer offic often one opportun ordeal ordinari origin ought outweigh overlap oversimplif oversimplifi overwhelm oxford p p.1594 p.175 p.28 p.51 p.72 p.73 p.8 part partial patholog pearson peopl perfect permeat person philip philosoph philosophi plato play plenari point polici polish pose posit possibl power practic precept prefer prescrib press principl prison prize probe problem problemat process product profess profit program proof propos provid provoc provok prudenti question rachel rampant rather ration read reader real realli reap reason refer refin reflect reflex regi relat relationship relativ relativist relev relianc religi report reproof republ requir respons result review right righteous roberto role ronald rule run sacr said say scholar school scientif scofield scriptur scrutini search secular see seek seen self self-gratifi sell sens sensit separ servic set seven seven-step sharper short show shut sign signific similar simpl simpli singapor situat six skil skill small smart social societi socrat someon someth sort spirit spite spread stage stand standard stanford start state statement steal step still stori strength strengthen strong stronger studi subject submit suggest superfici superior support surpris systemat tailor taken task taught teach teacheth teehanke tell templ tendenc test test-driv text theolog theologian theori therefor therein thing think thorough thought thousand three time timothi today touchston tradit transcend transform transgress translat tri true truth turn under underlin understand uneth unexpect uniqu univers unlearn unthink unto upbring upon us use valid valu vari vast velaquez velasquez verac verbal versus view want warn way weak weight well whatev whether whole wick william winner wisdom wiser within withstood wok word work world worst would write writer written wrong wrote year york zimbardo