Essays /

Can We Rely On Corporations To Essay

Essay preview

Can we rely on corporations to be ethical and responsible?

“Can a building have moral opinions? Can a building have social responsibility? If a building can't have social responsibility, what does it mean to say that a corporation can? A corporation is simply an artificial legal structure. But the people who are engaged in it, whether the stockholders, whether the executives in it, whether the employees, they all have moral responsibilities.” – Milton Friedman

Introduction

In this essay, I am going to argue that we cannot rely on corporations to be ethical and responsible, however, we can always trust them to act in their perceived best interests and in many cases, this is concurrent with acting in an ethically and socially responsible manner. There are two main reasons for this outcome. Primarily, corporations are instruments to be used by typically self-centred individuals – they act predominantly in their own interest and to do so is to maximise the profits of the corporation. As I draw upon Shaw & Barry (2007), I will show that corporations are run by individuals with egoistic objectives, who despite their personal views, are often forced to run corporations with profitability as their primary and sometimes only purpose. Consequently, individuals and consumers are becoming more self-aware of the actions and consequences associated with their behaviour. Indeed, as I invoke upon Parker (2002), I will show that consumers can and often do sanction corporations who choose to engage in unethical activities. These two principles make it imperative for the executives who manage corporations to conduct their operations in an ethical and socially responsible manner if they seek to ensure the financial success of their organisations. I will elaborate on this further throughout the essay by initially explaining the rationale behind corporate decision making, then consequently on how consumers can strongly influence the way in which corporations act, and finally, the different types of ethical theories which help explain the actions that corporations and individuals make.

Corporate Decision Making

To determine whether or not corporations can be relied on to be ethical and responsible, we need to understand the rationale behind the decision making processes of corporations. How do corporations choose to behave? What factors into their decision making processes which define their organisation’s behaviour? To be able comprehend corporate decision making, we need to initially understand the purpose of corporations – Why do they exist? Milton Friedman argues that a corporation is a neutral, artificial legal structure, which has one, and only one responsibility – to generate profits as long as it engages in open and free competition without breaking the law, with all other factors, such as environmental impact, being secondary considerations.

This is reflected historically in the Neo Classical model of organisational management and economics which dominated the approaches to production by corporations in the early 20th Century, where the costs associated with the production of goods and services were the overwhelming concern of business organisations, as evidenced by corporations such as Ford which revolutionised mass production techniques. Other factors such as the wellbeing of their employees and the social impact of their operations were inconsequential and only addressed when they obstructed the corporation’s ability to generate profits such as strikes by their employees. As I will substantiate later, corporations will always seek to act in their own interests in order to maximise revenue, and secondary concerns are addressed only if they impact on their ability to generate profit.

Aside from profit, there are many other factors which influence the decisions corporations make in their attempts to solve the economic problem of limited resources and unlimited wants. Chiefly, these are: the Legal system which regulates to an extent how businesses operate, Rules, which are the cultural norms which the societies of stakeholders of the corporation’s activity espouse, and the intrinsic complex nature of each problem in which corporations are required to address.

Laws are imposed by governments, and must be obeyed otherwise a severe penalty which can range from a war...

Read more

Keywords

19th 2 2002 2007 2008 2011 20th abil abl absolut accomplish account achiev act action activ actual address adequ adopt advent afford africa age aim al allow almost along also altern although alway amend amount and/or anyon approach appropri area argu aris around artifici asbesto asia asid aspect assist associ attempt attent auditor avail awar back backlash balanc ban barri base becom behav behaviour behind belief benefici best bliss break bribe build bulwark busi cannot capabl carri case categori caught censor centr centuri certain chang charg chiefli choic choos chosen cite class classic classifi clean clear clegg clout cocklin code coincid collect come communal communism compani compet competit complet complex compli comprehend concern conclud conclus concurr conduct confid conscious consequ consequentialist consid consider consum consumpt contain contend content contextu continu contrast convent corpor correct corrupt cost could counti countri coupl cours cover creat crime critic cultur current damag day deal decid decis defin definit degre demand demonstr denot depend design desir despit determin develop diametr dictat differ difficult difficulti digit dilemma direct disastr discern diseas disregard distort divest domin done draw due earli earlier eas easili econom effect effort egoism egoist either elabor elect employe encount encourag end engag enhanc enorm enough enron ensur entail entir entiti environment equal erad espous essay essenti et ethic even everi everyon evidenc evolut evolv exact exampl except execut exist expens explain extent extern extrem face factor fail fall fals famili fascism façad featur final financi find fine firm first follow forc ford form forsak found free freedom friedman friend fund gaol generat go goal good govern greater grey guidelin guilti hardi health heart heavier held help hide histor hold howev human hypothet ideal identifi ignor illeg illustr imag immedi immor impact imparti imper implement import impos imposs impoverish incap includ inconsequenti increas inde individu industri inflat influenc inform inher initi instanc instrument intang integr intent interest internet intrins introduct invent invest investor invok involv ireland issu jail jame judgement keep key kind know known kornberg lack larg lash later law legal less level liber lie like limit littl live liveabl lobbi long look lot lower loyalti made main maintain major make malpractic manag mani manner market mass maximis may mean meant measur media meet method milton minimum minor mislead model moral move much multipl must nation natur necess necessari necessarili need negat neo neutral non non-consequentialist norm note noth notion obey object obstruct obtain off often one onlin open oper opinion opposit opt order organis otherwis outcom outsid overwhelm paid parker part past pay penalti peopl perceiv permit person place point polici popul posit possibl potenti practic predomin prerequisit present prevent previous primari primarili principl problem process product profit progress prohibit protect provid public publish punish pure purpos put qualiti rang rational reaction realiti reason record redefin refer reflect refus regardless region regul relat reli remain remark report repugn reput requir resourc respons restrict result revenu revolutionis ridicul rife right righteous rise risk rule run salari sanction satisfi say scale scandal scenario secondari seek self self-awar self-centr sent serv servic set sever shape shaw show signific similar simpli simplifi situat small social societi sole solv sometim sought specif spoken stabil stakehold standard state stay stockhold stop strategi stress strike strong structur stub subsequ substanti success suffer suggest support surround surviv sustain system tactic take technic techniqu technolog term theori therefor third thousand throughout time total toward trade trade-off traffick transform true trust two type typic tyranni ultim unabl unaffili unavoid understand undesir uneth unlimit unspoken upon us use usual utilitarian valu vari varieti various vast vehicl viabil viabl victim view viewpoint vocal voluntarili wage want warn way welfar well wellb whether whole whose will within without work world would wray wray-bliss written wrong