Essays /

Can Women Achieve Success In The Essay

Essay preview

Can Women Achieve Success in the Workplace?

Rabiah Reyome

University of Phoenix

In today’s society, are men and women truly viewed equal or does societal influences play an even greater role in how well a person is able to achieve success? In 2007, “women occupied 46% of the U.S. labor workforce.” (U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Earnings, 2007). Studies have shown that the number of women holding top management positions is nominal. From the United States to Japan, gender barriers have kept well qualified women from breaking through the glass-ceiling. According to CNN Money (2006), there were only 10 women running Fortune 500 companies and only 20 in the top Fortune 1000. Even with women earning higher degrees than their male counterparts, can women achieve individual success in the workplace?

This question and many like it have been a source of considerable research and debate for many decades. My hope is that through this research and continued investigation, this information will lead to yielding a more progressive stance in providing tangible solutions for women to achieve individual levels of success in corporate America.

The term “glass ceiling” was introduced in a 1984, Adweek article. The expression was used to describe the barriers that prevent qualified women from achieving top executive level positions. Lampe (2001), stated that “An invisible, yet quite impenetrable, barrier serves to prevent all but a few women from reaching the highest ranks of the corporate hierarchy, regardless of their achievement and merits.” This observation is believed to be based on individual bias attitudes as well as corporate cultures. Continued practice of these types of stereotypes have nothing to do with intellect and more to do with the prejudices that have precluded women from being able to climb effectively up the corporate ladder in hopes of achieving their desired potential.

Traditionally, women have not held top leadership positions in corporate America. Although women are entering the workforce at a quicker pace than previously and are obtaining higher educational degrees, men still occupy the vast majority of senior-level positions. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, Women’s Bureau (1997), women made up 44% of total persons employed in executive, administrative and management occupations. Although this percentage may seem high, the metrics used to produce this number included a broad reach of occupations. These occupations ranged from fast food chains to c-suite corporate positions. Based on these findings, one could conclude that progress is being achieved in the promotion of women. But, because this information does not provide a concise breakdown on the percentage number of women in management positio...

Read more


-351 -97 1 10 1000 1984 1997 1998 2 20 2001 2006 2007 2008 2009 3 346 4 44 46 5 500 55 57 6 637 781 8 a.c a.h abil abl accept accord account achiev acquir activ ad addit adequ administr advanc adweek affect african african-american aggress alien allow almost also altern although america american analysi animos anoth appar april argument articl assert assign associ assum assumpt attitud avenu awar b balanc bar barrier base basi becom begin behavior behind belief believ berger better bias biolog black blame book break breakdown brizendin broad brought bureau busi c c-suit c.l career carri catalyst categori caus ceil census certain chain challeng chang change-manag characterist choic clear climb cnn color commit communic compani compar compet concis conclud conclus confirm confus consensu consid consider constraint consum continu contribut control corpor could counterpart countri creat creation crucial cultiv cultur current d.g databas debat decad decept decid decis defend defin degre demand demonstr depart derail describ desir destini determin develop diagram differ difficult difficulti disadvantag discourag discuss divers divis document doubl double-edg driver e.g eag earn edg educ effect effort either emerg employ employe energi engag enough ensur enter entrepreneuri environ epidem equal essenc establish etc evalu even exampl except execut exist expatri expect experi explain explan express extend face fact factor fall famili fast fault femal figur fill find firm fit flexibl focus food footprint forg form fortun free g.s gain garovich garovich-szabo gender gender-rel gender-rol generat genet glass glass-ceil global govern graph great greater group guid half held help hierarchi high high-level higher highest hire hold home hope identifi illustr impact imped impenetr imper implement import improv includ inclus increas indic individu industri influenc influenti inform injustic insch instead intellect interest intern interperson introduc investig invis issu j japan johannesen johannesen-schmidt journal judg justifi kept key l l.b labor ladder lag lamp later layer lead leader leadership led left less level librari life like limit line littl longer low lueptow m.b m.c made maintain major make male man manag manageri mani market marketplac masculin may mcintyr mean men mentor merit meta meta-analysi metric middl mirror model momentum money multin n n.k napier navig necessari need network new nomin note noth number nurtur observ obstacl obtain occup occupi offic one oper opportun order organ orient outlin p.1 p.23 pace pane pattern per percentag percept perpetu persist person perspect phase phoenix pigeon pigeon-hold place play popular posit potenti power pp practic preclud prejudic pressur prevent previous prior process produc profit program progress promot proquest prove provid pursu qualifi question quicker quit quo rabiah race rang rank rather reach realiti reason refer regain regard regardless relat repres requir research reshap respons result retain retriev review reyom ridgeway ridgway role room run satisfact savvi schedul schmidt second seek seem self self-employ self-promot senior senior-level sens serv set sex show shown sinc situat skill smallest social societ societi sociolog sole solut sourc speak specif stanc start state statist status status-quo stereotyp still still-exist strateg stride strong structural/cultural studi style success suit support sword system szabo talent tangibl task taught tend tendenc term theori therefor three thus time today tone top total tough tradit trait tri truli twenti type typic u.s ultim understand unfavor unit univers upper us use valid valu varieti vast versus view virtual volum wagner way well weyer white within without woman women work workforc workplac worthi would year yet yield