Essays /

Can A Native State Exist Within Essay

Essay preview

Political Scientists, Thomas Flanagan and Roger Townshend explain the key to the big question: “Can a Native State Exist Within a Canadian State?” in the readings: “The Case for Native Sovereignty” and “Native Sovereignty: Does Anyone Really Want an Aboriginal Archipelago?”. The essay will outline and provide evidence to both sides, whether there could or could not exist a Native State in Canada. The document will argue that Natives are not organized enough to form their own government. Throughout the decades, Natives have agonized many savageries at the hands of the European settlers. The essay will take Flanagan’s side with the belief that Natives should not be sovereign, using the textbooks “Principles of Comparative Politics”, and “Contemporary Political Issues”. According to Weber’s definition of the state, the state is “a human community that successfully claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory,” (Clark, Golder, & Golder, pp. 92). In the reading by Thomas Flanagan, “Native Sovereignty: Does Anyone Really Want an Aboriginal Archipelago?” explains his point of view based on Natives not gaining sovereignty. “Hunting-gathering societies have political processes that assign rank and dominance within communities” (Flanagan, pp. 43), as argued by Flanagan, native's hunting-gathering societies practice out of period political processes. Flanagan claims that Natives cannot have their own structure of government and this is why it wouldn’t make sense for Natives to want...

Read more


000 2 200 37 43 46 600 700 92 95 abl abolish aborigin absolut accommod accord across advoc affect agon aim allow alreadi alway america anoth anyon appli approv archipelago argu arrang arriv arrog assault assign assimil attempt away back band base becam begin belief believ belong better big build call canada canadian cannot capabl care case categori caus certain challeng charlottetown children citi civil claim clark classifi collect communiti compar con conceptu conclud consid constant contemporari control could countri creat current custom date decad defin definit democrat differ dismiss display distinct divid document domin due easiest economi educ effort embrac emot endless english enjoy enough environ especi essay ethnic ethnocentr european even event everi evid exampl exist expans explain fact fail famili familiar fill find first flanagan follow food forc form friendship frontier gain gather generat given golder govern gradual grew group grown hand happen henc histor histori huge human hundr hunt hunter hunter-gather hunting-gath ignor imposs indian individu inexperienc influenc instead integr interact intern issu jeopardi job keep key kind label lack land landform languag leav legitim life like limit live locat look made make man/woman mani marri massiv matter may mean meti model moment momentari money monopoli moreov move nation nativ near neglect never nevertheless new non non-aborigin non-nat non-status north one oper opinion opportun oppos order organ origin out-of-d outlin outsid particip particular past peopl period perman physic place plenti point polici polit poss possess possibl power pp practic principl process properti prove provid purport push question rais rank read realli reason recogn regim regular religion repetit reserv resid resourc revert right ritual roger savageri scatter school scientist seem sens separ settl settler sexual shape side singl small societi someth sovereign sovereign-given sovereignti spread stabl start state status stay steadi still stress structur struggl style success suggest suppress system take talk tend term territori textbook therebi third thoma though thousand throughout thus today took toward townshend tradit travel treati tri tribe type typic unabl use varieti view want way weber whether within work would wouldn yet