Essays /

Canada Vs United States Legal System Essay

Essay preview

Since the British North America Act was adopted in 1867, Canada has been developing and writing up their own laws independently from other countries. Many people believe that, though our Canadian laws have come far from the days of the BNA act, they are still not up to par with the harshness of American laws. The advantage that Canadians have over Americans is that in Canada, there is only one criminal code for all Canadians whereas in the United States, every State has their own criminal codes which, unfortunately for the Americans, are not identical. Also, the United States and Canada each have a law that is fraught with the possibility that an injustice will be brought upon those whom these laws apply. In the United States, it is the ‘third strike’ law, and in Canada, it is the 'mandatory minimum sentence' law. 'Third strike' laws are criminal statutes that mandate increased sentences for repeat offenders, usually after three serious crimes. This means that no matter what a criminal has done, they will always be sentenced more harshly because they are not able to demonstrate to society that they have learned from their past mistakes. A mandatory minimum sentence is an order that certain crimes authorize certain sentences. This means that no matter how many times an offender has commi...

Read more


10 110 120 13 14 18 1867 19 2 2007 2011 2012 22 25 29 3800 48 53 abl abus act action adopt advantag alan also alway ambassador america american anoth appli approach appropri april area arm arrest assault atkinson attempt author auto back believ block bna bridg british brought bus canada canadian captur carri case caught certain charg chest child children claim clear club code come commit compar complet conclus conduct consequ consid const constabl conveni convict could count counterpart countri court crime crimin criminal-justic d day death decri degre demonstr deserv despit deterr detroit develop die discount discourag dispar done driver easi enough equal equiti everi evil exampl except explain exploit face factor fair famili far farc film final fire fled former four fraught free girl given good gross group gun handgun harsh harsher heinous high histori human idaho ident incest includ increas independ infant injustic internet interview investig januari john judg june justic kiddyp kiddyvid kill know late later law learn leav legal lenient life live low man mandat mandatori mani match materi matter maximum may mean member men mere michigan minimum mistak moral much near never normal north novemb observ offenc offend old one open order other par park part past penalti peopl perform perhap person place point polic possibl previous previously-explain prison produc provid punish purpos question rape receiv rememb repeat residenti respect rettig return right rule sauv say scar seen sentenc serious serv sexual sexually-exploit shoot short shot show shown sicken sinc societi solicit space special state statut still store stream strike strong suffer surviv suspect suspici system taken term third though three time tom tough two u.s unfortun unheard unit unlik upon usual vernor veteran victim video view virginia vs west wherea window windsor would wound write year year-old yet young