Essays /

Canadas First Past The Post System Essay

Essay preview

In Canada Federal and Provincial First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) elections are based on single member districts or ridings. Each riding chooses one candidate to elect into parliament. In order to win a candidate must obtain the highest number of votes but not necessarily the majority of votes. The party that wins the most ridings is named the official government of Canada with the second place party becoming the official opposition. The (FPTP) system is also known as the 'winner-take-all' system, in which the candidate with the most votes gets elected. FPTP voting methods can be used for single and multiple member elections. In a single member election the candidate with the highest number, not necessarily a majority, of votes is elected. This system is used in Canada, UK, US, and India. Many Canadians are not happy with the current First Past the Post system currently in place for electing parliamentary officials provincially and federally. I think that Canada’s First Past the Post parliamentary electoral system should be changed because it favors tactical voting; it has a negative effect on smaller parties; and opens up the possibility of gerrymandering constituencies. A new electoral system that is more proportional is needed in order to address these problems.

There are a few problems that arise out of the FPTP system. One of the most important problems is the tendency for FPTP to favor tactical voting. Tactical voting happens when voters cast their votes for one of the two candidates that are most likely to win. This is done because it is perceived by the voter that their vote will be wasted if they were to choose to vote for a smaller party, which they would more prefer. This is an understandable feeling by the voter because only votes for the winning candidate actually count (Blais, 2008).

The position is sometimes summed up, in an extreme form, as "All votes for anyone other than the second place are votes for the winner"(Rosenbaum 2004), because by voting for other candidates, they have denied those votes to the second place candidate who could have won had they received them. Following the 2000 U.S. presidential election, some supporters of Democratic candidate Al Gore believed he lost the extremely close election to Republican George W. Bush because a portion of the electorate (2.7%) voted for Ralph Nader of the Green Party. Exit polls indicated that...

Read more

Keywords

-2011 000 100 1972 1997 1998 2.7 20 2000 2004 2006 2007 2008 27 33 41 45 5 7 80 abil abl absenc accord accur actual address adequ adopt advanc advantag advertis agre aim al all-urban also among amount anoth anyon approxim area aris aros assembl assert attack attempt attent attitud attract base basi beckenham becom belief believ binn blai boundari bring broader bush by-elect call campaign canada canadian candid case cast caucus caus cbc chang choos citi close come commiss compet compromis concentr concern conclus conserv conservative-lean consid consist constitu contend controversi could couldn count court crack creat critic current day decid decis defeat democraci democrat deni depriv design despit differ disagre discount discourag dissent distort district distrust domin done door drawn drogus duverg easili edward effect effici either elect elector enough ensur entir especi establish even eventu ever everi evid exampl exemplifi exit exploit express extent extrem extremist face factor fail fair farrel favor feder feel fewer find first first-past-the-post flaw focus follow forc forerunn form former found four fptp frequent friend gain gather general geograph georg gerri gerrymand get give given goal good gore govern gravit greater green group growth half happen happi hard heavi held highest hold howev ignor imag impact import inabl increas incumb incumbent-protect independ india indic influenc inform instead island issu justifi key knew know known label labour larg larger law lead lean left/liberal legisl legislatur level liber like loser loss lost main major make malon mani manipul map marti mauric may meaning media member merg method might minor moder most mp multipl must nader name necessarili need negat never new newer number observ obtain offici one one-parti open opinion oppos opposit order organ origin parliament parliamentari part parti particular partisan party-friend pass past pat peopl perceiv perpetu perspect persuad place play polar polit politician poll poor popul popular portion posit possibl post potenti power predict prefer premier presidenti press presum price princ print prioriti probabl problem process produc promot proper proport protect provinc provinci public put qualiti radic radio ralph ran rang rather re re-elect reason receiv redistrict reduc regina relat represent republican resort respect rest result ride role rosenbaum round rule run run-off rural sacrif saskatchewan saskatoon saw scientist seat second second-plac seek seen select selv set sever shortfal show signific singl size smaller solidifi sometim spread stagger strain strong substanti suggest sum support swift system tactic take televis tend tendenc therefor thin thing think third though three throw thus time today top toward trend turn two u.s uk under understand unfair unless unlik unnecessari upon urban urg us use viabl view vote voter vulner w wast way wherea wide win winchest winner winner-take-al within won worst would