Essays /

Canadian Legal System Restorative Justice Essay

Essay preview

Restorative JusticeAssignment 7ABy: Karyn White12/22/2008Submitted to: Robert TuckerFor the Course in CriminologyA discussion of the use of Restorative Justice Programs and their role in the Canadian Justice System.

 In discussing the effectiveness of Restorative Justice Programs as a method of reducing crime and the possibility of re-offence it is important to take note of the fact the crime rates in Canada are much higher than they were. In 1962 the crime rate in Canada was close to 2600/100,000 people and by 1997 the crime rate was reported at around 7000/100, 00 people. (, 2008)Although there have been slight decreases in crime rates over the past few years they remain statistically higher than they were years ago. What is it that is wrong with society today as opposed to 45 years ago (where crime rates were less than half of what they are in 2007) in order for this to be happening? I believe that by applying the principles behind restorative justice we can come to a more clear understanding of the answer to that question.

Restorative justice represents a return of the simple wisdom of viewing conflict as an opportunity for a community to learn and grow. It operates on the premise that conflict, even criminal conflict, inflicts harm, and therefore individuals must accept responsibility for repairing that harm. ( ,2008). It is seen as an alternative form of justice, in which the offender is obliged to make some form of restitution to the victim and by extension into the community (Winterdyk, 2007 pg.433) Restorative justice programs attempt to return the offender to a state of social responsibility as opposed to trying to enforce morals. With a sense of social responsibility and a stronger sense of community as well as the feeling of shame for his or her actions it is hoped that the offender will be less likely to offend again.

Before further examining why Restorative justice is an effective alternative to more common methods of rehabilitating offenders it will help to have a better understanding of why many of the other methods might not be as effective.

As stated by Winterdyk, (2006, pg 433) punishment is ineffective. Punishment can be viewed as ineffective for many reasons. Criminals have been punished to varying degrees in many countries for many years without the success that is expected. If harsher problems such as capital punishment, incarceration, electrical monitoring etc were successful at deterring crime why do so many criminal offend again and again? Why does crime continue to be such a major problem in Canadian society? In addition to these qu...

Read more


/crj/ /crj/tucker, /daily- /introcrime /introthe 00 000 14 17 1800s 1900s 1962 1970 1997 2001 2006 2007 2008 2008wikipedia 2009 2600/100 2nd 433 45 70 7000/100 7aby 90 abil aborigin accept accord accus action addict addit address administr agenc ago aid algonquin allow alreadi also altern although among amount answer appear appli applic approach aris around articl assist attempt attorney back base began behaviour behind believ better bond bright bring build busi c canada canadian cannot capit caregiv carri caus centr chanc chang children circl citizen class clear client close coincid colleg come commit common communiti compens complet compon conclud conclus conferenc conflict consequ consider continu contrast convent convers cost could countri cours court crime crimin criminolog criminologya crown cultur current daili dark date decis decreas dedic definit degre design desir deter determin develop disciplin discuss disorgan disput divers dl document dollar done drastic earli earlier edit educ effect electr empathi employ encourag enforc england especi essenti etc evalu even event evid evok ex examin expect expens experi explain extend extens extent facilit fact fair fall famili far fear feel felt find first fit focus follow form found gain gains-bas gather general give given glow goal good govern group grow half happen harm harmoni harsher heal help high higher home hope howev ibid idea identifi import impress improv incarcer includ increas individu induc ineffect inflict intens intent interdisciplinari interest introduct involv j.a judg judici juli justic justiceassign justif juvenil karyn kitchen l lack law learn least legal length less lesson liber light like link live logic look lose lower major make mani match may mean mediat meet member mennonit mention met method might million mind minimalist monitor moral moreov mother move much must navajo need network note number oblig offenc offend offer offici often one onlin ontario oper opportun oppos order orient outcom parent parker part particip particular past pay peac pearson penal peopl perform person pg pg.433 pg433 pictur place plan polic polit posit possibl poverti practic practis pre pre-determin premis prepar presenc present primari primarili principl probat problem process program programm provid psycholog punish punit purpos put question quotidien/080717/dq080717b-eng.htm r rate re re-off reach real reason recidiv reconcili recours recoveri reduc refer reflect regard regardless rehabilit relat relationship remain reoffend repair repar report repres research resolut resolv respond respons restitut restor result return right rise risk robert role root said sanction satisfact satisfactori see seem seen self self-worth sens sentenc serious serv servic shame show shown sight signific similar simpl slight social societi socioeconom solut speak state statement statist status stay stem step strain strengthen stronger studi success suffer support suppos system take task tax teach theori therefor thing thus time today togeth toronto trace tradit transform trauma treatment tri true truli tuckerfor two type undermin understand use valu vandal vari vermont victim victim-offend view vom wale way welfar well white12/22/2008submitted winterdyk wisdom within without work world worth worthwhil would wrong, year youth