Essays /

Canadian Senate Debate Essay

Essay preview

The Senate Debate

Stephany Shenouda
130604690
PO110- Tutorial 5
Word Count: 1159
July 1st 1867 marks the date that Canada confederated into a nation dedicated to promote democracy. Canada would be governed by a Parliamentary system consisting of an upper and lower chamber of legislation. The House of Commons, being the lower chamber is made up of elected representatives from across the country, democratically voting upon bills. The upper chamber, the Senate is made up of 105 individuals specifically appointed by the Governor General to represent certain geographical areas across the country. The Senate is primarily responsible for providing a “sober second thought” on bills passed on by the House of Commons. The chamber revises the bills, and occasionally passes it back to the House of Commons if amendments are needed. However, the Senate has become the target of public and political criticism because Canadians have begun to demand transparency and Government accountability. While some argue that it is time to abolish the institution entirely as it is much too costly, undemocratic, and unnecessary, others are offended that there is talk of destroying one of the strong bases upon which confederation was built.

The ignition of the debate regarding the role of the Senate in our Governmental Institutions have arisen from corruption, allegations, and second thoughts regarding the need for the Senate. Senators make a g...

Read more

Keywords

.. 000 10 105 106 11 111 1159 130604690 132 1867 1st 2012 2014 22 264 300 5 abil abl abolish accept access account across ad add addit alghabra alleg allow also although amend annual apart appoint appreci appropri approxim area argu arisen assur auditor back base basi becom begin begun benefici better bill block book born built canada canadian caus cbc/radio cbcnew certain chamber chang choos chosen cite claim climat come committe common compet concern confeder confid consid consist corrupt cost count countri critic dark date debat decis dedic demand democraci democrat demolit destroy die differ divers document done due effici either elect elimin enhanc ensur entail entir essenti exact exampl expens experienc extent extrem fear first fix forc former foundat futur general geograph globe govern government governor gross heat high hous housekeep howev huffington idea ignit impact import inde indirect individu inevit insight institut invit issu jan job juli keep knowledg law leader legisl lesli let limit live logic long look lower mackinnon made mail main major make man mani mar mark matter may minor modest money moreov much must n.d n.p nation necessari need nonetheless number obvious occasion occur offend omar one open oper opportun opposit option other overturn paper parliamentari part parti pass past peopl place po110 polit popul post potenti preston prevent primarili prior problem process promin promot proper prospect prove provid public purpos push quo radic rang reach reason reform regard regardless region regul remain reno renov repres requir resid respons result review revis role rss salari satisfi scandal second secret senat serv shenouda simpli sinc sit situat sober sound sourc specif spend spent status step stephani still stricter strong studi sun sure surpris system talk target tax taxpay tear therefor thought tighten time togeth tori toronto transpar trust tutori two typic unavail undemocrat understand unnecessari unrepres upon upper various vet veto view voic vote want way web well withhold within word work would year