Essays /

Canadian Shield Case Essay

Essay preview

Using the Accenture document on governance presented with the Alcan case, place Canadian Shield in the appropriate quadrant. According to the Accenture document, I would place Canadian Shield within the efficient, predictable operator category. The slow rate of change and need to compete on operational efficiencies characterized by most companies in this quadrant is detailed by the following quote from the case authors. “Sustainability for Canadian insurance companies greatly depended on investments in projects that increased customer service and improved operational efficiency.” This comment is aligned with the predictable operator company practices and is evidence that in order to gain a competitive advantage in the Canadian insurance industry it is vital that operational efficiencies are realized through better IT solutions at Canadian Shield and its parent company, Assurance Centrale Inc. (AC).

In the key decision going forward, is this Seamus' call? If not, whose decision is it? Who should make the decision? Under what decision area(s) in the Weill & Ross governance model does this decision fall? As the leader of Information Systems at Canadian Shield, one of many subsidiaries of Assurance Centrale, Seamus Reynolds was tasked with piloting a new information system that could potentially replace the IS’s at all of Assurance Centrale’s regional offices. F...

Read more

Keywords

1 18 2 21st 23 25 3 3.6 5 5.01 50 6 6.3 70 abandon ac accentur accord across ad addit advantag affect ai alcan align allow almost alpha alreadi analysi appear appli applic approach appropri archaic architectur area arriv assur author base basic becom behind believ better budget build busi calgari calgary-bas call canadian cannot capabl captur case categori central centuri chang character cio close comment compani compet competit complet complic conflict consid consider consist consult control corpor cost could council cours creat cs current custom date decid decis deliv depend despit detail determin develop direct display dissent document dollar easi econom effici either element employe end enterpris enterprise-wid entir essenti eventu evid exact execut exist experi extens extra failur fall feel final financi find five follow form forward friend function furthermor futur gain game get given go govern great ground happen hard head heavili help high high-level hold howev hurdl identifi immedi implant implement import improv inc includ increas industri ineffect ineffici inevit inform infrastructur initi instead insur interest invest iss issu keep key kind knowledg lack lag lay lead leader leadership let level like long long-term longer loss major make manag mani market matter mechan member mention million model monarchi necessarili need new non non-exist npv object obvious odd off-the-shelf offic old one oper opinion order outsid parent percent philosophi pilot place platform point possibl potenti practic predict prepar present pressur previous principl problemat profession project promis proper propos proven proxim put quadrant question quot rank rate realiz recommend recov reflect region remain replac request resourc respect respons rest retain rethink revenu revers reynold rfps right ross say scorecard seamus seem seen select sentiment servic shelf shield sign signific sinc situat slow softwar solut spearhead standard start statement strateg structur style subsidiari success summari sunk supplier sure sustain system take taken task team technolog tell term test theori think time togeth tough tradit train transform treat troublesom truth type underwrit unfortun unit updat us use user valu vendor viabl view vital vulner weight weill well whose wide wish within work workflow would write write-up year