Essays /

Canco Ltd Case Essay

Essay preview


Canco Ltd. case

Summary
The Canadian fradistat industry consists of four companies: Acme Ltd., Beaver Ltd., Canco Ltd., and Deeco Ltd. Though the industry is growing, it needs highly skilled workers where the products cannot be replicated with the current technology but the company focuses on local markets. Canco Ltd. was established in 1976 in Atlantic Canada and is the second largest company with a market share of 29% but the profits in 2007 were only third highest with the products of average quality. The company’s flagship plant in New Brunswick, for the past three years, has been operating below its capacity, as total industry sales in the eastern region have grown slowly and the company lost some of its share of the market to Beaver’s lower-priced products. Though Canco’s products have sold well in Western markets, the plant in Alberta was insufficient to meet the orders but the plant’s issue of bond was well-received by the market. Problem Statement and Objectives

How does Canco Ltd. improve the strategic positioning and profitability that could enhance its potential to compete in the industry? The company can use overtime to increase output in any plant to 20% above the plant's capacity. In western region the distribution costs are high while the manufacturing cost of eastern region is increasing in addition the tight labour market for skilled workers results in an increase of 15% in wages. The industry focuses on domestic market and the company has to face competition from the Beaver’s low priced products. Situational Analysis:

Canadian Fradistats industry is relatively an attractive industry as there are only 4 companies manufacturing fradistats, the key components of many industrial products. In addition there are no close substitutes for the products that the companies have great bargaining power over the buyer. Canco’s strengths outweigh weaknesses as it has second highest shares in the market but its low marketing reduces its sales. Company’s threats outweigh opportunities where the company has to face competition from the high quality products of Acme and the low priced products of Beaver where the return on equity is only third highest while the company has second high market share. Porter’s Five Forces

Supplier’s Power:
The suppliers are manufacturers and distributors. In this industry suppliers power is high because there are only four suppliers in the industry to satisfy customer’s demands. Each company is providing products of different quality at different prices. As there no substitutes, suppliers have great bargaining power. Fradistats are key components in many industrial products that suppliers have advantage over buyers. Buyer’s Power

Buyers are the manufacturers of many industrial products. The buyers have low bargaining power because the number of suppliers is a few in the industry. The substitutes are not many as these products are highly specialised components that cannot be replicated with current technology; the switching costs are high for buyers. Threat of Substitutes

The threat of the substitutes is very low in this industry. There are not such substitutes for these products as fradistats are the key components of many industrial products and can’t be replicated with current technology. Threat of New Entrants

The threat of new entrants is low as the barriers to entry are fairly high. It would take substantial time and investment to compete directly with the existing branded products in the industry. It is very risky to make a new entry in a highly competitive environment and even in past few years it become a tight labour market for skilled workers and it will be really hard to attract them. Internal Rivalry

The industry is highly competitive as there are only4 companies which produce identical products. The companies compete mainly on price and quality. As the products are identical, and key components in many industrial products, the companies compete each other by marketing and by increasing sales volume. PEST Analysis

Political Factors
There are not many political factors in this industry other than the safety regulations, paper works for transportations, shipping license and ...

Read more

Keywords

-15 -40 -50 /unit 000 1 1.0 1.00 1.50 10 1000 101 11 1334 15 15.4 156 16.1 16.7 17 17.4 17.9 175 18 19.3 19.92 1976 2 20 20.1 2007 206 21.66 22.23 22.39 22.4 23.21 24 24.3 25.1 25.75 25.98 26 26.9 27 2880 29 29.1 29.7 2961 3 3.02 3.7 30 3000 3033 31.3 3285 35.6 36 38 39.1 3940 4 4.26 40 4000 42 47000 48.6 4947 5 5000 56.4 57 58.4 6036 61 61.7 62 7 7.00 7.9 70/unit 700 733 75 8 8.0 8.00 85 9.69 9.7 accord acm addit advantag advertis advis affect agreement ajax alberta also altern among analysi area around atlant attract averag bank bargain barrier beaver becom benefici besid best better bond borrow brand bring british brunswick build built busi buy buyer calgari canada canadian canco cannot capac case caus central charg choos close cog columbia compani compar compet competit competitor complet compon consider consist consum continu cost could creat current custom cyclic debt decreas deeco demand deplet develop didn differ difficulti direct distribut distributor domest due eas easi eastern ebit econom economi effect effici enhanc enjoy enough entrant entri environ equal equiti especi establish even exampl exist expand expans expect expenditur expens experienc export face factor fade fair fall fastest financ financi find firm five flagship focus forc forecast four fradistat fulfil function fund futur get go god good great gross grow grown growth handl hard harder help high high/medium/low higher highest highly-qualifi hold holder huge ident imag impact implement import improv increas industri instant insuffici interest intern introduc introduct inventori invest investor issu key knowledg known labour larg largest largest-scal last lead leav less licens like loan local long long-term lose loss lost low lower lower-pr lowest loyal ltd main major make manag mani manufactur margin market match may mean medium meet might million money need net new next number object occur offset one only4 ontario oper opportun order origin other output outweigh overtim paper past pay peopl per pest plant play polit popular porter portion posit possibl potenti power premium price prioriti problem produc product profit promot provid put qualifi qualiti quebec quick rais rapid rate realli reason receiv recess recommend reduc regard region regul relat replic research result retain return revenu rise risk riski rivalri role safeti sale satisfi save scale second second-largest seem sell share ship short show situat skill slowest slowli smaller social sold south specialis spend statement strateg strategi strength substanti substitut summari suppli supplier switch swot take tax technolog term third though thousand threat three tight time total transport turn two unit use vari volum wage weak well well-known well-manag well-receiv west western wherea within work worker workforc workload would year