English 1010
2 April 2013
Argument Analysis Essay
In the first given argument “Absolutely. Government Has No Business Interfering with What You Eat” written by Bradley Balko policy analyst with the Cato Institute, Balko claims that our government should work towards a personal sense of responsibility for our individual health and well-being. Though it is reasonable to assume Balko makes valid points in his article there are little facts to support this claim.

In the second given argument “Not If Blaming the Victim Is Just an excuse to Let Industry Off the Hook” written by Kelly Brownell a professor and chair of psychology at Yale University and Marrion Nestle a professor in the Department of Nutrition at New York University.

This article is supported by professors that have degrees and knowledge that support their claim making Brownell and Nestle’s argument the strongest.
In the article written by Balkoa it states more opinion then actual facts to back his claim. He assumes that all people that are overweight are so because they eat too much. ...

/st 000fast 1 10 1010 2 2006 2013 263 264 265 3 absolut account actual ad agre also american analysi analyst annett anyth approach april argu argument around articl ask assum attack attent back badley balko balkoa becom bedford benefici better biolog blame bradley brownel busi calori campus care cato caus cereal chair chang children chose cite claim clear collid come condit consequ consum contain contribut control corpor could counter countri creat critic decis default degre demand depart diet donna eat edit educ eight element els english epidem essay even excus exercis experi fact fail fast fat fault feel first focus food foster freedom gain given global go goe good govern haisti health healthi healthier high hook human hurt ideal impli implor individu industri inform insist instead institut interest interf irrespons issu kelli knowledg lead less let lifestyl like limit littl machin maintain make marion market marrion martin may motiv much need negat nestl new nutrit obes offer one opinion overweight parent pay peopl perceiv person phd point polici poor posit privat problem professor profit promot psycholog public put question reason relat respons restaur rottenberg say school script second sens shift snack soda someth spend st state statement store strongest sugar suppli support tackl take tax thesi thing though three topic toward trap tri u.s unhealthi unit univers use valid vend victim view vs way weight well well-b wellb winchel work world written yale year york