Essays /

Authotarian Government And Economic Development Essay

Essay preview

Authoritarian Government and Economic Development

The purpose of this study is to examine the correlation between economic development and authoritarian governments. The objectives of this study are to find out whether authoritarian governments an impediment to economic growth and how the authoritarian governments are performing economically compared to the developed democratic nations. The study was conducted using a quantitative approach. In the first part of the study questionnaires were given to 40 students from International Islamic University Malaysia to find out their view on economic development and authoritarian government. In the second part, a comparison is done between the economic indicators of developed democratic nations and a group of selected authoritarian governments. The data suggests that an authoritarian government also can bring economic development to a nation.

Economic Development of a country and their political stability are always interconnected. If the society thinks that they are being worsened off by the current political system, it can lead to a political instability in the society. On the other hand, if the economy is politically unstable, it will reduce the incoming investment from abroad at the same time slowing down the development of a nation. That’s why it is always the goal of political economy to understand how institutional arrangements shape policy outcomes and human well-being. There has been some debate among the scholars about the degree to which institutional arrangements affect the economic development of a nation. Some researchers suggest a high economic growth among autocratic institutions is a proof that a “benevolent autocrat” can overcome the political obstacles necessary to create economic growth (Easterly, 2011). As a result, some suggest a benevolent autocrat is a necessity and an important factor for economic development during the primary stages of economic growth. Rostow (1971, p.57) states”... the buildup of an initial minimum quantum of social overhead capital (including the role of education), the bringing about of expansion in agriculture, and the generation of a supply of imports adequate for modernization have required important interventions and leadership by national governments.” However, Mulligan, Gil, and Martin (2004) find little evidence that political institutions enhance economic efficiency. The fact that the most of the developed industrialized nations are democratic was long taken as iron-clad evidence that only democracy can bring economic development. But the recent history, however, has complicated matters. The blistering economic growth of authoritarian governments like China without a political liberalization now suggests that the link between economic development and the liberal democracy is actually quite weak. The growing number of the affluent authoritarian state shows that they can reap the benefit of economic development without easing their political control. A key objective that motivates this paper is that an autocratic government is not always a disaster in economic terms. There is undeniable evidence throughout history that proves there has been economic development in autocratic governments. For example, Singapore was one of the fastest-growing countries in the last decade and the country has been classified as a ‘Growth Miracle’ (Przeworski et al. 2000) and as an ‘Asian Tiger Economy’ (Young 1995). The regime, led by Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, defended his form of government stating that it is very much needed to boost the economic development in the developing countries (Sen, 1999). The fast growing economy of China also challenges the notion that democracy is always essential to the economic development of a country. However, this paper is not intended as a defense of autocracy, but as means of gaining further insights into the issue why autocracy can sometimes be successful. We will focus on one underlying dimension, which is to find out the position in economic development of authoritarian governments compared to the developed democratic countries. This paper will focus on autocrats that exist today and will try to empirically find out whether their institutional arrangements are better than those of democratic developed countries. We will not only look in to regimes which are robustly high performers, but will also take int...

Read more


-0.28 -108 -190 -2.37060365 -25 -4.18 -5 -5.15 -69 -7 -75 -77 -89 1 1.44911676 1.46 1.600000024 1.70000005 1.799999952 1.82917577 10.4 12 126 14.2 155 157 163 18 183 189 19 1971 1979 1988 1990 1993 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 2.06463583 2.09966695 2.400000095 2.5 2.66 2.94 20 2000 2002 2003 2004 2005 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2011.benevolent 211 23 25 27 3 3.1 30 33 334 39 4 4.1 4.116828042 4.33722198 4.373 4.97 40 456 49 5 5.3235955 5.4000001 5.599999905 5.96201295 5.99228034 50 51 55 6 6.08 6.3 6.30350968 6.310692238 6.78342445 65 68 68.4 68.5 68.7 68.9 69 69.2 7 7.262136966 7.28 7.43445282 7.76 7.78 70 71 73.89870732 73.98292683 74 74.07 74.1619268 74.2582439 74.4115122 74.42407317 74.57982927 74.63787805 74.7316341 74.8592439 74.8850244 74.90219512 75 75.03507317 75.042 75.0756098 75.1707561 75.288 75.3117317 75.4579024 75.823 75.97660976 76.1240488 76.2648537 76.4020488 78.13743902 78.34104878 78.534 78.7177805 78.8938293 8 8.34 8.427180494 8.456343021 8.56998005 80 80.03 80.15 80.40 80.62 80.88 81 82 85 88 9.2 9.3 9.6 92 96 abil abroad abstract accord account achiev activ actual address adequ adkin adopt advanc advantag affect affluent africa age agricultur al alesina also although alway america among amount analysi andrea annual approach arabia argu around arrang asian assign attain authoritarian authotarian autocraci autocrat averag awar bad bahrain bangladesh bank base basic believ benefit benevol better beyond birth blister boost bouckeart boudewin bread bring build buildup c calcul cannot capabl capit capita case cato certain challeng chang chapter cheltenham china choic clad classifi close close-end collect collier come compar comparison competit competitor complet complic concentr concept concern conclus condit conduct conflict consid consist consum contribut control correl could countri coup creat crisi cuba current d data de deal debat decad decis defend defens defin degre demand democraci democrat demographi develop developmenet diamond dimens direct disagre disast discuss distribut domest done down dr draft e eas easter econom economi economid ed educ edward effect effici elgar emerg empir encyclopedia end endow engag enhanc enrol environ especi essenti estim et etat european even evid examin exampl except exchang exclud exist expand expans expect experienc extent extern extract f fact factor faculti famous fast fastest fastest-grow favor femal feng figur fill find firm first five fluctuat focus follow forc form found franc freedom frequent fulli g gain gdp geest general generat germani gerrit gil given goal good govern gross group grow growth gwartney hand harvard healthcar help high highest histori holcomb hopkin howev human hypothesi identifi impedi implicit import incent includ incom increas index india indic industri ineffici inequ inform initi inkel input insight instabl institut insurrect intend intens interconnect interdepend interest intern intervent introduct invest iron iron-clad islam issu j jame japan john johnson journal key kingdom klein knew know korea kuan kulliyah kurth kuwait l label labor larg largest last latin law lawson lead leadership led lee legal level lewi liber life like likelihood limit limongi link literaci literatur littl live local long long-term look lot low lower luu m main major malaysia male mani manual march martin mass matter may mean measur mechan mesquita method methodolog michael microeconom militari minimum minist miracl modern moomaw mortgag motiv much mulligan murki name nation natur nber nd necess necessari need negat neither new newauthoritarian norm north notion number nyu object obstacl octob old one opinion organ origin outcom outperform overal overcom overhead p p.57 p.79 pakistan paper part parti particip past paul peopl per percent percentag percept perform perhap period person perspect peter polici polit popular porter posit power preliminari press primari prime princeton problem process produc product professor promot proof propogand prospect prosper prove przeworski purpos qualiti quantit quantum question questionnair quit rais randal random rate ratio real reap reason recent recess reduc refer reform regard regim regular relat remain repres requir research resourc respond rest restraint result review rivalri robert robust role ronald rostow rule run saudi savvid scholar school scope second section see select sen servic shape show shown signific similar simpl singapor sirowi size slow social societi sometim southern split stabil stabl stage standard start state statement still stimul strengthen structur student studi subject subprim success suggest suppli supplier support suppress suprem surpris surviv system tabl table1 take taken technic term test theori therefor thikn think though threat threaten throughout tiger time titl today tool topic total tri tsebe two type u.k uncertainti undeni under underdevelop understand understood unemploy union unit univers unpopular unstabl us use various vietnam view volum w wage weak wealth well well-b west whether whose without world worsen written year yew young