Essays /

Government Essay

Essay preview

 According to the U.S. constitution, the second amendment protects the right of citizens to keep and bear arms, but it does not prohibit gun control laws. Several cases have brought up the issue of whether the requirements and restrictions that gun control laws impose such as, what guns can be used, who can use them, and where they can be used are a violation of this amendment. Based on my research, I believe that all citizens should have the right to bear a gun regardless of service in militia, but gun regulations that are reasonable to ensure public safety do not violate an individual’s second amendment.

District of Columbia v. Heller could be used as precedent case as it addresses this debate and helps define the second amendment. In 1967, The District of Columbia created strict gun control laws that banned all handguns and a requirement that all other guns at home must be kept unloaded and disassembled. Dick Heller and five other D.C. residents claimed they needed functional guns in their homes for self-defense and decided to challenge these gun control laws, but didn’t object to a registration requirement for the guns an...

Read more


12th 1939 1967 1990 38 40 abl absolut accord across act activ address advantag affect affili along also amend anoth answer area aren argu argument arm arrest ask associ attend author balanc ban base bear believ beyond bodi brought busi buy calib carri cartridg case caus challeng charg chicago circuit citi citizen claim claus columbia commerc common compar complet conceal condit confront congress consid constitut contribut control cost could court creat crime d.c deal dealt debat decid decis defend defens defin definit deliv deni determin dick didn direct disassembl dismiss district disturb doesn due econom educ elementari enact engag ensur environ equip exampl exceed exercis extent extrem far feder feel firearm five found free function general govern grade ground guarante gun gun-fre hand handgun held heller help high hold home howev illicit illinoi import impos incorpor indict individu inhibit insur interst intim isn issu keep kept kill later law lead learn legisl like limit line local lopez machin made main may mcdonald mean middl militari militia miller motion move municip must nation need nfa oak object offici one order ordinari outsid ownership park person petition poss possess power preced prior privat probabl problem prohibit protect prove provis public rais reason receiv recent regardless registr regul reject requir research resid restraint restrict revolv right rule safeti saw sawed-off scare school second seen self self-defens sell servic set seventh sever shotgun show similar state strict struck student subject suboordin suffer suprem tailor therefor time transport trial turn two u.s unconstitut understand unit unlicens unload use v violat violent want way weapon well whether would zone