Essays /

Should Government Funding Good Marriage Promotion Essay

Essay preview

Marriage is a fundamental social institution. As an institution, marriage is the foundation of a harmonious and enriching family life and the basic building block of our society. As the cornerstone of the family, marriage produces children; provides children with mothers and fathers; and produces many social, economic, and health benefits for children, adults, and society generally. By most measures, marriage helps keep children out of poverty. But should governments be involved in promoting marriage? If government-funded initiatives could promote healthy marriages, child poverty would almost certainly decline. But it's not clear that the proposed programs will prompt more couples to marry, and if they do, whether the resulting marriages will be stable.

On one side is the 'marriage movement' a loose group of conservatives, religious leaders, and social scientists who want to strengthen the institution of marriage. Some of them advocate marriage because they are morally certain that it provides the best kind of family. Others, including most of the social scientists in this camp, favor it because they believe children's well-being would improve if more of their parents were married.

"Now we're looking at marriage in a new way: as a public health education issue," says Diane Sollee, the director of the Coalition for Marriage, Family, and Couples Education in Washington. It's inarguabl...

Read more


-504 12 1960 1995 20 2004 27 28 30 300 37 478 479 482 488 5 51 57 75 8 abus accord action activ activist actor actor-soci actual adult advertis advic advoc affirm agenda aid almost alreadi also although america anoth antipoverti argu around assist attent author babi basic believ benefit best better birth block born budget build camp cannot carrier certain child childbear childless children christian christin cite clear co co-author coalit compar complex concern confer conflict congression conserv consid contempl context convinc cornerston could council counsel coupl critic current daniel debat decad decis declin decreas defend defiant depriv devot dian diploma director disadvantag divers divorc dollar dr econom educ effect encourag end enrich everi everybodi everyon evid exampl experienc famili father favor feder feel feminist find five food forc format found foundat fraction frequenc fund fundament gay general go goe good govern government-fund grabmeier greater grier group hand happi harmoni health healthi help henrick heritag high higher hispan horn hous human impact import improv inappropri inargu includ incom increas inde indic individu initi institut involv issu jan jayd jeff jonsson jun keep kid kind know larg later lead leader legisl lesbian less liber life like link litcher live look loos lose lot low low-incom lower major manag mani margin marit marri marriag may measur medicaid men million minimum monitor moral mother movement need needi new news non noth often ohio one oppon opportun organ other out-of-wedlock outcom paid parent parenthood patrik penni per percent percentag person perspect peter plan point polici poor posit poverti pregnanc preliminari prepar prevent privaci privat problem produc professor profound program promot prompt propos provid public put rate re rebuild receiv regard relat religi report repres research resolut result right rise rose said say school schwartz scienc scientist se sep separ servic show side singl single-par skill social societi sociolog solle spend stabl stamp state stay strengthen studi subsid substitut suggest sum support sure sympathet teach teen temporari tie time today toward train trampl tri turn unhealthi univers unw us use wage want washington way wedlock welfar well well-b whether white without women work would year yet