Essays /

Government Fast Food And American Obesity Essay

Essay preview

5 March 2013

Government, Fast Food and American Obesity
Should the government get involved in controlling what food options are available to American consumers in an effort to fight the war on obesity? The obesity rate for Americans today has almost doubled compared to the rate in 1997 (CDC, 2012). Some believe this increase, especially in children, has to do with the increase in so many unhealthy fast food restaurants (Chou et al, 2010). However, does the government have the right to tell fast food restaurants what to serve or tell people what to eat? It would seem to be the individual's responsibility to take charge of his or her own health, yet obesity is rising and leading to more health issues. Therefore, government should step-in by restricting the amount of high volume fat, sodium, and other unhealthy ingredients served in fast food restaurants, by requiring the calories to be clearly listed, and by providing more education for people because these changes will have a positive effect on the health and choices of consumers.

First, the government should restrict the amount of fat, sodium and sugar used in certain fast food items, as well as educate people about the harmful effects of consuming processed foods in high quantities. The government could set guidelines for how much is used in a menu item. For example, a McDonald's cheeseburger contains 810 mg. of salt when the American Heart Association suggests a daily adult intake of no more than 1500 mg. (AHA, 2013). Does McDonald's really need to use so much salt in one burger? With two cheeseburgers, an adult is already over the recommended intake. What about children, whose bodies are smaller and still developing? According to the AHA, “97% of children and adolescents eat too much salt, putting them at risk for cardiovascular diseases when they get older” (AHA, 2013). According to the Harvard School of Public Health, processed foods, fried foo...

Read more


-161 -66 /obesity-prevention-source/obesity- /obesity/data/trends.html. 000 1 13 1500 157 1997 2 2000 2002 2004 2005 2006 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 207 210 23 3 4 5 6 61 62 7 810 82 97 academ academia accept accord across action addict addit address adolesc adult advertis affect ago aha al almost alreadi also altern america american amount anoth anyway argu articl associ ate attent attitud avail away bad balko base basketbal becom begin behavior believ belong benefit better blackburn blame bodi burger busi calcul california call calor calori carbohydr cardiovascular care career carl case catch caus causes/diet-and-weight cdc center certain chain chanc chang charg cheeseburg childhood children chocol choic cholesterol choos chou cigarett clear clinic comp compani compar complex concept concern concret condit confus consum consumpt contain content contribut control conveni cool cost could count countri court cream creat crisi cultur custom daili david decad declar decreas deep depend develop diabet diet differ direct diseas doesn doubl easi easili eat eaten eater econom ed educ effect effort end environ especi et even everyon exampl exercis fact famous fast fast-food fat fee feel fight first follow food forthcom found freeli frequent fresh fri fruit fund g gain gerald get give go good govern greedi grossman grow guidelin gym habit half hamburg hand harm harvard haygood health healthi healthier heart help high higher howev http ice illustr imag import ina inc increas individu industri inexpens influenc inform ingredi intak introduc involv isn issu item jama journal jr judith juli junk kentucki key kind know known l lack larg last law lead learn least less lifestyl like limit list littl lock lock-and-key longer look lot make make-up man manchest mani march market masculin may mayb mcdonald meal mean membership mention menu mg michael mindset mislead money mouth movi much nation need negat new nicotin norm norton nutrit obes odd often older one option order over p p.396 packag parent park pay peopl per person pie place plan polic pool portion posit pound pre pre-packag price pride privat problem process product profit program proport provid public put quantiti radley rare rashad rate realiz realli reason recommend recreat refer regard regul requir respond respons restaur restrict result retriev right rise risk role rough salad salt say scale school scienc science-bas scientist second see seem seen sell serious serv set sever sexi shelv shift shin shin-yi short show similar simpl size small smaller smoke social societi sodium sold solut soon spring star start statist steadi step step-in still stock stop studi sugar suggest super supermarket swim take teach televis tell therefor thing time tip today top tough town trail trend triglycerid true turn two u.s unawar unhealthi use valid valu veget volum w walk walker want war warner wast watch way weigh weight weight-gain well whose wil without work would wouldn written www/ year yet yi york young zinczenko