Essays /

The Influences Of Family Communication Patterns Essay

Essay preview

TABLE OF CONTENT

CHAPTER | CONTENT | Page |
1.0 | Summary of the Reading Chosen * The Influences of Family Communication Patterns on Adult Children’s Perceptions of Romantic Behaviors | 3-5 | 2.0 | Biography of Author * Michael Fowler, MS * Judy C. Person, Ph. D. * Stephenson J. Beck, Ph. D. | 6-9 | 3.0 | Literature Review * My Opinion * Support * Against | 10-15 | 4.0 | Reference | 16 |

5.0 | Appendix | 17 |

1.0 SUMMARY
* The Influences of Family Communication Patterns on Adult Children’s Perceptions of Romantic Behaviors The family plays an essential role in social learning and all these information processing, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes are related to family communication schemata. Since the family environment is where most communicative behaviors are leaned and developed, the family may well be the most important perspective for understanding communication. Hence, it would seem conceivable that communication patterns among family-of-origin members influence future relational behaviors. Some of these future relational behaviors may consist of relational maintenance and ritual behaviors. Relational maintenance and rituals have been found to be reliable predictors of satisfaction and stability among committed romantic relationships. A routine and ordinary behavior that couples experience in their daily lives may contribute to the health of a relationship by providing a foundation for major couple events. The idea of this study is to discover how communication patterns within individuals’ family-of-origin are related to relational maintenance behaviors and rituals used within romantic relationships. Families are children’s major socialization agents which individuals interact in interpersonal relationships to a large extent on how they have learned to communicate in their family-of-origin, so-called family communication patterns. Parent-child interactions have the capability to influence future spousal interactions and the quality of origins family relationships has predicted offspring’s marital quality. Family communication is not easy to understand and explain because of the complex way it develops. To discover how parents shaped children’s information processing. Firstly, people could learn about another person’s perspective and adopt their view. Secondly, people could learn about another person’s assessment or viewpoint and discuss it until they reached a mutually shared understanding. A complete explication of family communication needs to consider both inter-subjectivity and inter-activity. The three dimensions of family schemata which are expressiveness (conversationally oriented), structural traditionalism (conventional in beliefs and conforming) and avoidance (avoiding conflict) to investigate how it affected family communication. Families first construct a social reality through their interactions with each other and they then widen models of communicating based on their routinized behaviors and coorientation. Conversation orientation and conformity orientation are the measurement of family communication patterns. Also, it influences behaviors within the family as they shape how family members understand their social environments and it has the influences beyond one’s original family structure. There are two types of outcomes which is behavioral and psychosocial. Individuals who experience higher levels of conversation orientation also experience higher levels of family satisfaction. Rituals function to retain relationship and also are considered as a genre of communication events. The seven ritual types have been developed among married couples that include both meaning and routine, such as couple-time rituals, idiosyncratic/ symbolic rituals, daily routines and tasks, intimacy express...

Read more

Keywords

-1 -10 -15 -2004 -2005 -2007 -2008 -2010 -2011 -5 -9 /communication/faculty/judy_c_pearson/ /communication/faculty/stephenson_j_beck/ /fileadmin/communication/beck_cv_s12.pdf /fileadmin/communication/pearson_cv_sept_2011.pdf /pub/mike-fowler/15/b5/186 000 001 1.0 10 16 17 1972 1973 1976 1977 1987 1989 1991 1995 1999 2 2.0 2000 2001 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2010 2011 23 25 3 3.0 4 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 5 5.0 501 6 8 abus academ accept accomplish accord achiev act activ adapt address administr adopt adult advic affect african agent aggress agre agreement al alcohol allow also although alumni alumnus alway among amount analysi analyst anoth appendix appl appli area art assess assist associ assur attach attack attend attitud attract author avoid awar award award-gradu b.a bachelor back background base basi becam beck becker behavior belief besid best beyond biographi board bond breast bremer brigham broadcast broader bs c call cancer capabl care carl case caster categori center central chaffe champaign chapter characterist child children choic choos chosen citat cite citi class climat cloud collaps comfort commit common communic communication/marketing complet complex conceiv concern conflict conform conscious consequ consid consist construct consult content context contribut control convent convers coorient couch could council countri coupl couple-tim cours critic cross cross-cultur cultur current custom customer-focus d daili dakota dayton decemb decis degre democrat demonstr depart depend describ design develop differ dimens disagr disclosur discov discret discuss distinguish divid divis doctor done dr draw drug earli easi educ effect effort ei either elder emphas employe encod end engin environ equal equip equival error especi essenti esteem event exchang execut experi explain explic express extent extern f faculti fall famili family-of-origin far fargo father featur field fight first fitzpatrick focus follow form found foundat fowler francin function fundament futur generat genr get goal golden good graduat grant group growth habit hand harmoni head health held henc heterogen high higher highest his/her histori hold homogen honor honorari hospit human i.e idaho idea identif idiosyncrat illinoi imit impact imped implement import includ increas inde independ indiana individu industri influenc inform initi innov insight instanc instrument intel intellig inter inter-act inter-gener inter-subject interact intercours interdepend interest intergener intern interperson intersect intimaci investig involv j join journal judi juli juri k kansa kappa key keyton kind know knowledg koerner l larg largest last later lead leadership lean learn lectur less level life like literatur littl live long look lot loui louis-post love low m macrocognit main mainten major make manag mani manner marit market marri marriag mass master may mcleod mean measur mediat member merritt messag method methodolog michael might militari minnesota minor mistak model month most mother motiv move ms much mutual n nation natur ndsu near need neglect network news nonprofit north nowher obedi observ obvious occur offspr often ohio one open oper opinion optim order ordinari organ organiz orient origin other otto outcom outstand overarch own page parent parent-child part particular past pattern pearson peer peopl perceiv percept person perspect ph ph.d phi philosophi place plan play point polish poor popul posit post predict predictor prefer present presid presidenti primari primarili princip privat proceed process profession professor profil proper protect provid psychosoci public purpos qualiti quarrel reach read realiti reason receiv recent recipi refer reflect relat relationship reliabl repeat report repres research resili resourc respect respond retail retain reveal review rhetor right ritual role romant routin run sale samuel sanford satisfact saxton say schemata scholar search second see seem segment self self-disclosur self-esteem separ servic set seven sever sexual shape share simpl sinc small so-cal social societi sought sourc speak speech spiritu spousal st stabil stanford stanley start state statement stephenson strateg strategi stress structur student studi subject suffer summari support symbol sympathi system tabl take talk task teach teacher team teenag tend term theater theatr theori thing think thompson thought three time togeth top topic toward tradit tri trust turn two type typic u.s undergradu understand uniqu univers upgrad upi upon urbana urbana-champaign use usual valu varieti verbal view viewpoint way wayn websit well western widen within without women word work world would wrong www.linkedin.com www.linkedin.com/pub/mike-fowler/15/b5/186 www.ndsu.edu www.ndsu.edu/communication/faculty/judy_c_pearson/ www.ndsu.edu/communication/faculty/stephenson_j_beck/ www.ndsu.edu/fileadmin/communication/beck_cv_s12.pdf www.ndsu.edu/fileadmin/communication/pearson_cv_sept_2011.pdf yahoo year yet young