Essays /

Can Government Intervention Be Effective In Essay

Essay preview

Can government intervention be effective in correcting market failures associated with alcohol?

I have chosen to perform a microeconomic analysis surrounding the effect of Alcohol consumption on society. ‘Can government intervention be effective in correcting market failures associated with alcohol’ is the question set. The model I will be exploring is ‘market failure’ ‘where the market mechanism fails to allocate resources efficiently’ (Smith et al, 2006, p.56)

The Times

‘Alcohol-related treatment costs the NHS £1.7bn.’

The Telegraph

Londoners are losing an astounding 1.68 million working days as a result of alcohol-related absence.’ ‘The Telegraph’ microcosmically displays how the issue prevails all around us as a society. It’s clear from numerous sources including ‘Alcohol Concern’ describing the ‘epidemic’ proportions of the problem. Mark P. Taylor describes Economics as ‘The Study of how society manages its scarce resources’ (2006, p.5). The issue is clearly rooted within individual decision making as well as analysing how society is allocating its limited resources. The 3 major issues below exemplify the 3 main causes of the market failure. Information: Failure to provide good information (a public good) is a major cause of market failure and brings about the consequences of drinking alcohol hence reducing the efficiency of the market. Evidence suggests that advertising has strong detrimental effect on consumption, particularly for youth. (Saffer and Dave, 2003). The development of Markets promoting alcohol consumption benefits the industry groups however no such private incentives provide information that presents the negative consequences of consumption. Self-control issues:‘1.2 million incidents of violence are alcohol-related’ (The Times, 2007) and 360,000 incidents of domestic violence (Simmons,, perpetrated show lack of control. Intervention is happening, a four-year government review into the nation's alcohol culture found a system that encourages people to consume until they collapse incurring costs such as health on society as a whole, so the goods and services provided by the market are not in our best interests costing our society its efficiency. Externalities: Alcohol (a De-Merit Good and not in societies best interests) creates private costs...

Read more


-19 -57 /1/hi/health/7090864.stm /btg/conf0604/papers/godfrey.pdf /business/profiles/clarke /digest/nov03/w9676.html /health-eu/news_alcoholineurope_en.htm. /press-releases/ministers_and_industry_join_forc?version=1 000 1.2 1.68 1.7 10 13/11/07 1480 16 1998 20 2001 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 25/09/01 27th 2nd 3 332 360 4 56 8 a2 abc above-averag absenc abus accid accord account accur activ ad adolesc advantag advertis affect al alcohol alcohol-rel alloc allow alon along also although analys analysi anderson anoth answer approach area argument around articl ass assess associ astound australian avail averag awar b bbc bear beer begin behaviour believ benefit best bibliographi blear bn born bottl braumberg bridg bring broader build c cameron campaign cannot capabl caus chosen clark clean clear collaps combin commiss communiti compris concept concern conclud confer consequ consist consum consumpt content control correct cost could count creat cultur current curtail curv d data dave day de de-merit dealt decis deficit demand depend deriv describ detriment develop differ direct display domest download draw drink drink-driv drive due econom economist edit educ effect effici elast emc emphas encourag epidem equal essex et etc etherington europ european evid exampl exceed excess exemplifi explor extern eye fail failur final financi fine fiscal fit fix focus forc forward found four four-year free full full-alcohol-strength fund gap general generat given godfrey godrey good govern government graph grasp greatest gross group h happen happi health healthcar henc henceforth higher highlight hour howev i.e identifi illustr immedi import impos improv inaccur incent incid includ inclus increas incur indic individu induc indulg industri inelast inform institut interdepend interest intern intervent interventionist intox introduc invis irrelev irrespons issu j januari june knowledg l la label lack lager larg leav less level like limit link london long lose lower m main major make maker manag mani margin marijuana mark market market-failur maxim may measur mechan media medic merit messag met microcosm microeconom might million model money moral motiv move nation need negat neglect net new nhs non non-pric normal novemb number numer ofcom one oper opportun optimist option other outlet overal p p.115 p.5 p.56 p1 p2 p77 paper part particular pay pearson penal penalti peopl per perfect perform perpetr perspect pmc pmcs point polici polit popul posit power pp pp.16 pp.5 precept present press prevail prevent price primari principl privat problem problemat produc promot proport propos protect provid public publish purchas put q q1 q2 question rais rang rate rather ration reason recogn reduc regul relat releas remov republish requir resourc respons restrain restraint restrict result review rise root rose rule run safe saffer said say scale scarc scheme school scienc section see seek segment self self-control self-protect selvanathan sens servic set short show simmon simpl simpli simplist sinc singl situat size smaller smc smith social societi solut someth sourc specialist standard start stem step still stop strength strong studi substitut suggest support surround system take tax tax-inclus taxat taylor technolog telegraph ten term theoret theori thompson three time tobacco togeth toward trade transport treatment tri trobe tune tv ultim understand uniform unit univers unpaid unpopular us usag use user utilis utilitarian valu venu viewpoint violenc vital volumetr want warn warsaw watchdog way weak week welfar well whole william within word work would year yes young youth