For most of the large existential risks that we deal with here, the situation would be improved with a single world government (a singleton), or at least greater global coordination. The risk of nuclear war would fade, pandemics would be met with a comprehensive global strategy rather than a mess of national priorities. Workable regulations for the technology risks - such as synthetic biology or AI – become at least conceivable. All in all, a great improvement in safetywith one important exception. A stable tyrannical one-world government, empowered by future mass surveillance, is itself an existential risk (it might not destroy humanity, but it would “permanently and drastically curtail its potential”). So to decide whether to oppose or advocate for more global coordination, we need to see how likely such a despotic government could be.

This is the kind of research I would love to do if I had the time to develop the relevant domain skills. In the meantime, I’ll just take all my thoughts on the subject and form them into a “proto-research project plan”, in the hopes that someone could make use of them in a real research project. Please...

02 05 05pm 1 2013 accept accur actual advoc agre ai aim also analysi anoth armstrong arriv art asid assess author avoid becom benefit better bias biolog blog care certain chat choos chose circumst collaps comment communiti comprehens conceiv conflict conservat contact contribut convers coordin cost could cowardic criticis current curtail deal debat decid defin definit democrat desir despot destroy detail develop devot differ disagre disappoint disast discuss domain drastic effici effort elid empow enough ethic even evid except existenti fade fall fanci feel form futur get global good got govern grasp great greater hard harder high hope host howev huge human idea ideal impli import impress improv ineffici inform interest investig juli kind larg last lay least less libertarian like likelihood ll long loss lot love main major make mani mass meantim mention mess met might minimalist moral motiv much nation need note nuclear obvious odd often one one-world opportun oppos other outcom page pandem paradis paradisiac passion peopl perform perman plan pleas polit post potenti predict prefer previous prioriti probabl problem project proto proto-research push radic rather ration re reach real reason refin regim regul relat relev reliabl research risk safeti safetywith save see short short-term shouldn sinc singl singleton situat skill socialist someon specif spend stabl start state strategi strict stuart subject surveil synthet system take talk technolog term thank thought thus time today toward transit trigger two tyrann tyranni ultim unresolv us use usual valu vast ve visit vs want war well well-worn whether whole whose wish work workabl world worn worri would wrong x