Essays /

Transaction Costs In Assessing Canadian Government Essay

Essay preview

Transaction Costs in Assessing Canadian
Government Services Sector P3s

Michael Pogorzelski
PPAS 3190
Prof. Murray Cooke
March 20, 2012

Every public private partnership differs in its ability to achieve efficiency. However, some sectors seem to have inherent differences in terms of the types of risk they subject projects to, and the subsequent transaction costs involved. The challenge in assessing the use of public private partnerships is to create a baseline against which individual projects can be compared. John and Salim Loxley make the case for Value-for-Money assessments, which should include Public Sector Comparisons for partnerships. This paper attempts to show that higher quality VfM assessments must include transaction costs in the equation to establish value. It goes on to explore the variables that most impact transaction costs in the sector of government services. This paper agrees with the literature that transaction costs are a critical element too often excluded from value equations. Secondly, it finds that despite difficulty in distinguishing the category the government services sector shows some propensity towards higher transaction costs due to a push for electronic service delivery due to high levels of uncertainty, long contract lengths, and asset specificity on the part of private partners.

This paper employs a mixed approach of explanatory case study and systematic literature review to identify what measures were used to assess the performance of public private partnerships (“hereafter P3s”) in the government service sector, what previous research has determined as their level of performance, and the variables that influenced their success. The paper is structured to first discuss how transaction costs factor into efficiency assessments and explore what variables influence these costs. The paper then goes on to analyze cases of P3s in the government services sector against these variables, in order to explore the relationship between the government services sector and transaction costs. The relationship is then evaluated against the perceived success of P3 projects. Given the data limitations and its prescribed length, this paper has chosen to narrow the scope of its assessment to what has been called a hidden cost of Value-for-Money assessments: transaction costs. The limitations of this study are the reliance on underdeveloped existing data, limited access to project documentation, a small sample of cases, and changes to public actor competencies with the introduction of specialized P3 agencies. The time span offered by the case studies is short; out of the six cases used by this paper, the oldest dates back only 12 years. Access to data on projects presents a limitation in that materials used in doing preliminary assessments, contracts, and other project documents are often inaccessible to the public. This paper also assumes a bias in that disparaging data has a higher probability of being suppressed, particularly since the main sources of case study data- the Canadian Council for Public Private Partnerships (hereafter the “CCPPP”) and project proponents both public & private- are P3 advocates.

In order to assess the use of P3s, we must begin by defining the terms, identifying relevant variables, and establishing criteria for a baseline. John and Salim Loxley make the case for better Value-for-Money assessments including Public Sector Comparisons for P3s in his book Public Sector Private Profits (2010: 180). Higher quality VfM assessments include address of transaction costs. The following section begins by discussing why transaction costs are relevant to assessments of efficiency, and explores further what variables influence these costs. Sourcing & Transaction Costs

Sourcing refers to a number of procurement practices, including traditional procurement, outsourcing to the private sector, or partnership hybrids such as P3s. Sourcing decisions are driven by competencies/considerations of internal resource capabilities- such as scale considerations- and transaction cost, but the assumption that private sector organizations intrinsically offer the benefit of economies of scale has been discredited. The literature agrees that proper assessment of cost savings must include address of both parties’ comparative advantage in creating economies of scale and scope, and that sourcing decisions must be based on the consequences of strategic choices of both firms’ capabilities and strategic goals. This is where the concept of partnership becomes valuable, in that an optimal sourcing decision may be a compromise between traditional vertically-integrated government procurement methods and pure market contracting. This paper uses the CCPPP definition of P3s, which is: “A cooperative venture between the public and private sectors, built on the expertise of each partner, that best meets clearly defined public needs through the appropriate allocation of resources, risks and rewards.” While partnerships can take a number of different arrangements, the public private partnership is simply this at its core. The assessment of P3 efficiency involves multiple components. John Loxley describes the commonly accepted sources of efficiency- the maximum level of services provided with a given amount of resources- as including cost savings in the form of lower labour costs, economies of scale, economies of scope, and innovative management. Value-for-Money (VfM) assessments are a common method of assessing P3 arrangements in Canada, which calculate the cost of the public sector comparator (PSC) minus the cost of the P3. The P3 option is chosen if VfM is sufficiently positive. Transaction costs in sourcing projects, however, have been described as a substantial cost th...

Read more


-00 -10 -100 -154 -167 -170 -195 -198 -2009 -2011 -2012 -23 -240 -29 -389 -406 -407 -414169 -44 -451 -49 -558 -7 -81 /about-alberta/inventory-of-major-projects.html. /about-us/annual-reports/ /annual-reports.php /assets/publications/reports/2011_afr_eng.pdf /assets/publications/reports/cps_2011-12_eng.pdf?method=1 /ccppp/src/public/project?project_id=186&scope=view&timestamp=1c383cd30b7c298ab50293adfecb7b18&pageid=3d067bedfe2f4677470dd6ccf64d05ed /ccppp/src/public/project?project_id=197&scope=view&timestamp=28dd2c7955ce926456240b2ff0100bde&pageid=3d067bedfe2f4677470dd6ccf64d05ed /content/about/profile.php /english/about/archives-one/project-implementation.aspx /files-4/publications.php. /resources/about-ppp/definitions.html /templates/projects.aspx?id=2147488447 0.5 1 10 100 101 104 108 11 12 125 128 13 135 14 147 15 16 166 17 171 18 18.5 180 19 197 1985 1988 199 1991 1993 1994 1997 2 2.5 20 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2008/09 2009 2010 2011 2012 2012/13-2014/15 21 215 219 22 220 226 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 3 3.8 30 300 31 3190 32 33 34 35 37 387 393 4 42 441 47 49.95 5 545 55 6 60 61 62 66 7 71 8 829 856 86 88 9 969 97 986 99 abil abort accept access accommod accompani accord account achiev across activ actor actual ad addison addison-wesley addit address administr adopt adrian advantag advic advoc advocaci aecl affect affidavit aforement agenc agre agreement akbar al alberta alleg alloc almost alon along also altern although amount anagnostou analysi analyz angela announc annual anoth appal appear appli approach appropri april/may arbitr archiv arcom argu argument arlington arrang arthur ascertain assess asset associ assum assumpt asymmetr atom attempt audit auster autom avail avantika award back bajari balanc banducci base baselin basi bc bear becker becom began begin behalf behavior behaviour benefit best better bettigni bias bich bid bidder biolog board boardman book bookstor border borin boundari bridg bring bristol britain british budget budgetari build build-fin built busi buyer calcul call cambridg canada canadian cannot capabl capac capit carsten case categor categori ccppp centr central certif challeng chamber chang choic chosen chris cite civil claim clear client columbia combin commerc commiss commit commod common compani compar comparison compet competencies/considerations competit complet complex compon compost compromis concept conceptu concess conclus condit conduct confer confus conjectur connect consequ consider consist consortium constraint construct conting contract contracting-out contractu contribut control convers cook cooper copyright core corpor corporat correl cosmo cost could council counterpart counti court cp creat criteria critic cursori cv d.l daniel data databas date david de decis decreas defenc defi defin definit degre delic deliver deliveri demonstr des describ design design-build-finance-maintain-oper despit detail determin develop differ difficult difficulti dilig disclosur discredit discuss disguis disparag dispel display distinct distinguish distribut divers document draft drive driven driver drivetest drummond due dutil e earli earliest econom economi ed edit edouard educ effect effici electron element emphas employ end energi enforc engag engin england enhanc ensur enterpris environment eoin equal equat equiti equival establish estim et evalu even event everi exacerb examin excel except exclud exclus execut exist experienc expertis explanatori explor exploratori express extent extra facil fact factor fair fall feder fee fernwood file final financ financi find finn firm first first-ord fiscal five follow form found fragil fred free fund futur g g.a general gerber germani get ghere given goal goe govern gray greater green greve guarante gyan hab halifax hartley hazard health hereaft hidden hierarchi high higher histori hodg hold howard howev hrab human hybrid i-ii iacobacci ian ideal identifi ii ill ill-defin impact imperfect implement import improv inaccess inc incent includ incomplet incorpor increas incur indic individu industri influenc inform infrastructur infring inher initi innov inquiri intang integr intent inter inter-firm interdepend interest intern intricaci intrins introduct inventori invers invest involv irish issu issuanc j.e jame jason jefferi jeffrey john join journal juli justic justifi keatley keith kuan la laboratori labour lac lack land langford larg last lawyer lead lee legal length less level like limit line list literatur litig littl locat logic london long lonsdal low lower loxley ltd lunch m.e made maher main maintain major make manag manageri mani manufactur mapl march marcus mario market materi matter maximum may may/june mb mccarthi mcguin measur mechan media meet merx method michael million ministri minus mislead mix model money monitor montreal move multipl murray must mutual myth n name narrow nation natur necessari need negoti network new news non non-exist norm note nuclear number nutrient o.e obscur observ occur octob offer offic offset offsit often oldest one ontarian ontario oper opportun opportunist optim option order organ ottawa outsid outsourc outstand p p3 p3s pan pan-canadian panel paper parker part partenariat parti particular partner partnership past patent path patric patrick patrizia pattern patterson paulin pearson perceiv perform perhap perspect physic plaintiff plan plant pogorzelski polic polici polit pool poschmann posit possess possibl potenti power pp ppas ppp practic prakash preliminari prescrib present press previous primarili printer privat privé probabl probe problem procedur proceed process procur produc product prof profession profil profit progress project promis promot propens proper propon proportion propos provid provinc provinci provis psc public public-priv public-privé purchas pure purpos push put pérard qualif qualiti queen quotat québec r r.k rand ration rational reach readili realiti recent recontract record redeploy reduc reev refer reform registri regul reinder relat relationship releas relev reli relianc remov renam renegoti renew report reput request research resourc respect restructur result resurfac retail return review reward rfei rfp rfq rhetor risk role ross rout roy rudimentari rule safe sage salim sampl sandford save scale school scienc scope search second section sector secur seek seem select seller sensit servant servic set sever share short show side signific similar simpli sinc singapor singh singular situat six small social sold sole sometim somewhat sought sourc span special specif specul srilata stage standard state stem steven storag strateg strong structur studi subject submit subsequ substanti success suffici suggest suit summari superior suppli support suppress survey sustain swiss sworn system systemat t.w tabl tade take tbd technic technolog teo teramina teranet term test theori third thompson thorough threat tie time timelin toronto total toward tradit transact transfer transform transport treasuri treat treatment trust turn type typic uk uncertainti underdevelop univers upgrad us use v valeri valu valuabl value-for-money variabl ventur verifi versus vertic vertically-integr vfm vine virtual want wast wastewat water wave way websit well wesley west wherein williamson within without won word work wors would year yew zaheer