Question: Does democracy produce worse government than dictatorship produces?

Introduction
For the sake of ruling a country, we demand a system which can provide justice and also protect the basic rights of people. Basically, there are two systems in the contemporary world, democratic system and dictatorship. When people determining which form of government is better, it always comes to a fierce debate. For instance, America, United Kingdom, India are the countries which have a democratic form of government. On the other hand, countries like China, Egypt, and Cuba etc are following the dictatorship form of government. Thus and so, which one is better among these two types of government? Now, let’s have an in depth analysis of democracy versus dictatorship. Definitions of Democracy and Dictatorship

The U.S. president, Abraham Lincoln defined democracy as the government of the people, for the people and by the people. In such a government, people are their own rulers. A democratic government is formed via election. All adult citizens are eligible to vote and choose for their representatives. Therefore, democracy is a people's government or a majority ruled government. According to Levine (1993), there are three types of democracy: Firstly, participatory democracy (direct) means a government emphasizes popular participation, majority rule and political equality, for example, the referendum and the initiative. Secondly, representative democracy (indirect) means a representative government is formed based on constitutionalism and free elections, such as the US Congress. Thi...

000 100 11 1787 1965 1969 1993 20 2008 2011 2011owing 3 abolish abraham abus accept access accord account act addit adequ adopt adult advantag affair aftermath aid also although alway america among analysi announc arbitrari arm assist august author authoritarian avail base basic begin better board branch brzezinski burma burmes case central china choos citizen coercion come communic communist compar comprehens confer congress consensus constitut contain contemporari contend contrari contrast control countri critic cuba cyclon daiichi deal death debat decid decis defin definit demand democraci democrat denot depth despit destruct determin dictatorship direct disast disclos disoblig distribut done earthquak eas easili econom economi egypt elect element elig emphas enforc enhanc enjoy entir equal equiti especi essenti etc even exampl execut fail fair featur feder fierc first follow forc form framework free freedom freeli friedrich fukushima full furthermor gaddafi gain general germani go good govern governor greatest group hachiro hand handl henc high highest hitler hostil human ideolog imparti import improv inadequ inclus independ india indirect individu industri influenc inform initi instanc institut intern interven introduc introduct issu japan japanes joke judiciari justic kan kill kingdom know lack law leader legal legislatur less let levin libya libyan life like lincoln main major make manner march mass materi maxim mean media minist minor minut moreov muammar name naoto nargi nation natur new northeastern nuclear offici one opposit order orient outrag parliament part parti particip participatori particular peopl period physic polic polici polit popular power presid prevent prime principl process produc protect prove provid public qe3 qualit qualiti question radiat rather receiv refer referendum refus regul relianc repres requir reserv resign resourc respect respons rest result reveal revel right ruin rule ruler sake scholar second select separ septemb set seven signifi singl small social societi soviet specifi speech stakehold stalin state still strong suffer suffici supervis support suppress sure system take taken tend term terror therefor third three thus totalitarian trade transpar tropic tsunami two type typic u.s uncorrupt understand union unit urg us use usual verifi versus via vote way week whether within world wors yoshio