Essays /

Government Intervention Vs Obesity Problems Essay

Essay preview

Government Intervention vs. Obesity Problem
As a result of the recent public debates centered around our nation’s rising obesity problem, Michael Marlow, a professor at California Polytechnic State University, did his research when it came to what does and does not work when the government tries to intervene in the lives of Americans and their eating habits. He goes into great detail in 2012 with his article, “Government Intervention Will Not Solve Our Obesity Problem”, about the actions the government is currently taking and the results they are getting. His article is very persuasive because he uses facts and research to support his findings.

Michael starts off by stating that it is not a question whether or not the nation’s obesity rate is rising. “According to the National Center for Health Statistics, the prevalence of obesity among adults more than doubled from 13.4 percent in 1960 to 34.3 percent in 2008. A new report released this month by the American Journal of Preventive Medicine predicts that by 2030, 42 percent of Americans will be obese and 11 percent will be severely obese, or 100 pounds overweight” (Marlow 1). This logical appeal is very persuasive in showing that there is a major problem with obesity in America. These numbers are staggering. The percentages he uses here are very important because he’s showing that these numbers are continuously rising and there is no relief in the near future. The information h...

Read more


1 100 11 13.4 15 1960 1970 1970s 2000 2008 2012 2013 2030 28 34.3 40 42 5 absolut accord achiev action actual add adult age agenc agricultur allow alreadi also america american among amount anyth appeal approach approxim argument around articl ate attack attempt back becom bigger block brew bulk busi buy california calor calori came case caus center chain chang choic cite citizen classifi come common complet congress consequ consum consumpt contain continu control coronari could count countri current cut debat declar decreas demonstr depart detail detect die diet dietari discount diseas doubl drink drinker easier eat effect either end engag epidem equip even excel face fact failur fat feb find follow food forc frequent futur get goe good govern great guidelin habit health healthi healthier heart help ice idea import increas individu ineffect influenc inform intak intend intens interest interven intervent job journal june law less lift like live lobbi local logic loss low lower lower-pr made major make manag market marlow matter meanwhil medicin menus method michael mind month most move much nation near new news next noth number obes one opposit order overal overweight part pass past patron peopl percent percentag persuad persuas pertain pill pizza place point pointless polici polytechn popular post pound predict present pressur preval prevent price problem produc product professor program prove proven public purchas put question rate realli recent reduc refer regul releas reliabl relief replac report requir research restaur result ridicul rise risk rout said saw seem sens sever shake share shortcut show side sinc soda solut solv sourc spokespeopl stagger start state statement statist sugari support surgeri sweeten switch take target tax tea test thing think though thus time tomato tri trustworthi turn u.s underestim univers unlik urg usda use veget vs watcher way web weight whether whole without word work wrap year younger