Essays /

How Far Was The Provisional Government Essay

Essay preview

How far was the Provisional Government responsible for its own downfall?

In the light of this question, it is somewhat plausible to put forward the thesis that the Provisional Government , quite extensively, was responsible for its own downfall due to its internal failings with the party and incompetence that hold it solely to blame. However, one could counter argue this argument this by saying that it was the Bolsheviks strengths, strategies to manipulate events to their advantage and heightened sense of popularity over the Provisional Government that ultimately caused a decline in support for the Provisional Government and aided in their demise.

The Provisional Government was largely responsible for its downfall in 1917 for a number of reasons. Firstly, it could be argued that the Provisional Government was doomed to fall due to the nature of its existence. In the first Provisional Government led by Prince Lvov, it became apparent that it lacked legitimate authority because it was not an elected body. The Provisional Government was made up of former Duma members who had refused to disband at the Tsar’s demand. As such, they had no legitimate claim to the loyalty and obedience of the Russian people, which was a weakness that was contributory to its downfall in 1917.

The Kornilov Affair provides strong evidence for the Provisional Government being responsible for its own downfall in 1917. The initial misunderstanding between General Kornilov and the Prime Minister of the Provisional Government, Alexander Kerensky suggested that there were severe communication pro...

Read more


1 1917 700 80 abil act addit advantag affair aid alexand all-tim allow alon alongsid altern anoth appar appear area argu argument arm aspect assist attack author becam began behaviour beyond blame bodi bolshevik boost bread brought build capac caus certain chairman chang circumst citi civilian claim class commonplac communic complaint concept conclud condit consequ constitut contest continu contribut contributori control could counter countrysid coup creat credit criticis damag day dealt death decis declin decreas deep defend demand demis demonstr depend deriv desir despit detriment direct disband discont doom downfal dramat due duma earlier econom effect elect empir enabl erad even event evid exhibit exist expens extend extens extent fact factor fail failur fall far feed first follow food forc form former formid fortun forward found front fuell gain gave general german get given go govern great group guard heighten held help highlight hold hope howev huge illeg impact import imprison incompet increas industri inevit influenc initi instig insurrect intern issu juli june kerenski key kornilov lack land landown larg led legitim lenin lessen lie light like likelihood limit line listen littl live low loyalti lvov made main manag manipul may mcr member middl militari minist misjudg mistak misunderstand moreov movement mrc natur near near-death number obedi octob offens offer offic one opposit organis ottoman overst paranoia paranoid parti peac peasant peopl perceiv perfect petrograd place plausibl play point popul popular portray power prime princ prison problem prompt properti propos protect prove provid provision put question quit quot reason receiv red reduc refus reign rejuven releas reliant resent respons result retali reviv revolut rise role ruin rural russia russian say second seiz seizur sens set sever shortag side signific simplist sinc situat skill slogan social sole someth somewhat soviet starvat stop strategi strength strike strong stubborn subsequ success suggest summaris summer suppli support take territori thesi threat throughout thus time took trotski tsar turn ultim undid unelect unlik unrest upon upper use valid vantag vital war wave way weak weaken well within worker world would