Essays /

Ethics Of Welfare And Government Assistance Essay

Essay preview

Patrick Cassidy
PHL 215
Ethics of Welfare and Government Assistance
When the topic of welfare is brought into an ethical discussion most individuals would surely see it as an ethical act that genuinely helps those in need. This is true to an extent, but is it possible that welfare does more harm than good? Most would argue that the hand out of money to those less fortunate is being socially responsible. The question that drives this ethical issue is where does social responsibility end and personal responsibility pick up? This question is difficult to answer because every family in need is in a different situation. Government benefits are supposed to be used as a crutch for families to get back on their feet, but about twenty percent of all families receiving welfare stay on the program for more than five years. {text:bibliography-mark} This is the base of ethical issues surrounding government assistance and social responsibility for the needy. Many individuals believe that receiving a government hand-out allows people to become satisfied with being on welfare. If programs like food stamps and welfare aren’t effective, they are essentially a black hole for the tax dollars of working Americans. There is no denying the fact that there are needy families out there who are so impoverished that they need aid, but it is nearly impossible to separate the abusers from the desperate. It is for this reason many arguments can be made for both sides of government assistance. The most common question is, how far should a government’s social responsibility stretch? The issuing of government benefits derived from tax dollars is a strong ethical dilemma that has both social and economical repercussions. {text:bibliography-mark} The first way to look at this problem from an ethical and moral...

Read more


215 3/23/10 abl abus accur act action actual advanc age aid alcohol allow along also altruist american amount anoth answer anyth apart appli aren argu argument around assist associ attempt back backseat base battl becom bed behav behavior behind belief believ benefit bibliographi bibliography-mark bill black bring brought call cassidi charg chariti check cigarett cite coin collect come common communiti compass complain complaint complet consequ contribut could countri creat critic crutch cultur day deal decis defin definit deni deriv describ desir desper develop differ difficult digniti dilemma discuss dollar domin drive driven dull duti dysfunct earn econom effect egoism egoist egotist element empti end enough ensu envis essenti establish ethic even everi everth everybodi exact exampl excess exist expect extent fact fall famili far fault favor feel feet first five food fortun free fund furthermor gambl genuin get give go good govern grasp greed greedi hand hand-out happi harm help hold hole howev human hurt idea imposs impoverish individu interest issu job keep kink known lack land larg less life like line look lunch made mail main make man manag mani manner mark materi matter may money moral much multipl must near need needi never offer one oper opinion opposit other pass patrick pay payer peopl percent person perspect phl pick place point polic poor popul portion posit possibl pride probabl problem program promin prosper provid psycholog purpos qualifi question rather real realist realiti realli reap reason receiv refus regard regul remain remov repercuss represent requir respons revolv right run safe satisfi say see seen self self-interest selfish separ short show side simpli sinc situat sleep social societi sole spend spent stamp state stay stigma still stretch strong suggest support suppos sure surround system take tax tax-dollar tax-pay text theori therefor thing think thought three titl toler topic treat tri true twenti two type unearn unit univers us use utilitarian valu view want warrant way welfar well win within work world would year