Essays /

North Face Essay

Essay preview

Assignment 2: North Face
Auditors are faced with the very difficult task of insuring the public, that in their opinion, the financial statements of their clients are accurate and free of any material misstatements. The problem is that materiality is a subjective figure. In the North Face case an immaterial revenue recognition entry ended up being material when compounded with additional misstatements. North Face was the perpetrator of the intentional misstatements but they were concealed by the Deloitte audit advisor, Richard Fiedelman. Fiedelman allowed additional non-recognizable revenue to be posted and altered/replaced the original working papers that reported the original material misstatement. (Knapp, Rittenberg, Johnstone, & Gramling, 2012) Several generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS) were violated (In the Matter of Richard Fiedelman, 2003) resulting in declining stock prices and Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) sanctions. SEC Sanctioned Richard Fiedelman

The SEC requires the all registrant working papers be reviewed by a partner that is not assigned to the engagement. When the Deloitte concurring partner found the discrepancies and misstated revenue they investigated further leading to the review and the ultimate discovery of the altered working papers. North Face’s audit committee then retained a second accounting firm to investigate the accounting records which led to the SEC sanctioning Fiedelman. (Knapp, Rittenberg, Johnstone, & Gramling, 2012) 1. The SEC sanctioned Richard Fiedelman for failing to document the changes that his subordinates had made in 1997 North Face work papers and for failing to exercise due professional care. Explain the SEC’s rational in making each of these allegations. The SEC found that Fiedelman violated GAAP by allowing recognition of profit margin on the second barter transition and violated GAAS 150, 230, 326, and 338. (In the Matter of Richard Fiedelman, 2003) Failing to Document Work Paper Changes

Per the several GAAS violations the SEC was right to sanction Fiedelman for failing to document the changes made to North Face working papers. AU 338 (339A) directs auditors on the importance of working papers. Working papers are the “principal record of the work that the auditor has done and the conclusions that are reached concerning significant matters.” (Public Company Accounitng Oversight Board, 1982) The working papers help insure that the audit engagement has been properly planned and adequately supervised. It is also the record of the audit evidence and procedures applied to the audit. Fiedelman also violated ...

Read more

Keywords

-06 /issues/2005/may/thenewimportanceofmateriality.htm /litigation/admin/34-48578.htm /standards/auditing/pages/au150.aspx /standards/auditing/pages/au230a.aspx /standards/auditing/pages/au326.aspx /standards/auditing/pages/au339a.aspx /standards/auditing/pages/auditing_standard_11.aspx /standards/auditing/pages/auditing_standard_14.aspx /standards/auditing/pages/auditing_standard_3.aspx#retentionandsubsequentchanges 000 1 11 14 15 150 1972 1980 1982 1997 2 2001 2003 2004 2005 2010 2012 230 230a 28 3 3.9 326 338 339a 4 5 90 accept accoun accounit accounitng account accountancey accur accuraci action ad addit address adequ adit advisor affect aggreg alleg allow alreadi also alter altered/replaced analysi analyz anoth answer appli appropri april area ask assess assign assum assumpt assur au audit auditor august awar b barter base basi behavior behind billion blunder board came care career case catch cengag certain certainti chang charact choic circumst clear client code commiss commit committe common compaani compani complet compound conceal concern conclus concur conduct conscious consid consider constraint contemporari continu cooper correct could coumpani cours critic date decemb decis declin defend degre delet deloitt detect deter determin difficult direct discard discov discoveri discrep discuss document done due els employ end engag enough entri equal error establish estim ethic evalu even everi evid evidenti exchang execut exercis explain face fact fail fair fear feel fiedelman figur financi find firm first fluctuat found framework fraud free frequent fundament futur gaa gaap gain general get go goal good graml happen hard help hide histori hold howev hurt immateri implement import incom inconsist increas indic individu influenc inform insight instruct insur intend intent invest investig investor involv issu j johnston journal justifi key kind knapp lack larg larger lead learn led legal less level like lofti made mainstream make man manag manger mani margin mason materi matter may mean meet million misstat modif modifi monitor moral must name necess necessari need neglig net new non non-recogniz north note notifi novemb number occur octob offer one opinion order origin other oversigh oversight paper partner pcaob pcaobus.org pcaobus.org/standards/auditing/pages/au150.aspx pcaobus.org/standards/auditing/pages/au230a.aspx pcaobus.org/standards/auditing/pages/au326.aspx pcaobus.org/standards/auditing/pages/au339a.aspx pcaobus.org/standards/auditing/pages/auditing_standard_11.aspx pcaobus.org/standards/auditing/pages/auditing_standard_14.aspx pcaobus.org/standards/auditing/pages/auditing_standard_3.aspx#retentionandsubsequentchanges pcapb pcoab peculiar per perform permit perpetr person personnel place plan posit possess post practic prepar present pretent prevent price princip principl problem procedur product profess profession profit proper provid public punish put qualit qualiti question ration rational reach realiz reason recognit recogniz record reduc refer refus registr releas relev reliabl relianc remain rememb repercuss report reprimand reput request requir requisit respons result retain retriev revenu revenue/sales review revis richard right risk rittenberg rule sale sanction sec second section secur seem servic sever signific sinc situat skill small someon speci specif standard state statement stock strateg subject subordin supervis support suspend suspens system take taken task team thing think thorough though three time toler transit u.s ultim understand understood uneth unfound unqualifi unusu upon use user valuabl violat vorhi want whenev whether without work would www.journalofaccountancy.com www.journalofaccountancy.com/issues/2005/may/thenewimportanceofmateriality.htm www.sec.gov www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/34-48578.htm year yet