Essays /

North Korea And Nuclear Weapons Essay

Essay preview

Nuclear Weapons and North Korea |
Is Acquisition Rational? |

Daniel Gray11/29/2011 | | James TimberlakePol Sci 240 |

The Soviet Union successfully tested its first nuclear bomb on August 29, 1949 that signaled an end to U.S. hegemony. At the conclusion of their April 2008 summit, Presidents George W. Bush and Vladimir Putin agreed that the Cold War was over. Conventional strategic thought and military action can no longer prevail in an era of increased globalization. Developing states, such as North Korea, as well as irrational actors, like South Korea, can play an increasingly influential role among the international world. The success of the former Soviet Union with nuclear proliferation established an imbalance of power in Eastern Europe causing a global level of insecurity. As the Cold War evaporated, the protection of states by the former Soviet Union’s nuclear umbrella also disappeared causing them to look elsewhere or internally for protection of their sovereignty. Herein lies the purpose of this paper – to establish whether it is rational for North Korea to pursue the acquisition or development of nuclear weapons. By using two of Sagan’s theoretical models: security and domestic politics, this paper will establish whether it’s rational for North Korea to pursue nuclear weapons. THE SECURITY MODEL

A. Assumptions
The security model establishes neorealist assumptions that nuclear weapons serve as deterrents or coercive tools to compel changes in the status quo against another state. Kenneth Waltz argues that the distribution of capabilities across states defines the structure of the international system. An anarchic, decentralized, and self-help system, a state’s survival stems from the relative power or capabilities. This pursuit of power equates to a zero-sum game where one state’s gain comes at another state’s loss. Thus there is a powerful incentive for North Korea to maximize its power to guarantee its long-term security. The destructive power of nuclear weapons will shift the balance of power in the region from the U.S. to North Korea and guarantee the security of the state and would compensate for the ineffectiveness of conventional forces while presenting a danger to our rivals. States must “balance against any rival states that develop nuclear weapons by gaining access to their own nuclear deterrent” and access to nuclear weapons is an effective means for North Korea to b...

Read more


-05 -08 -11 -16 -1997 ./south /. /english/read.php?cataid=nk00100&num=6699 1 10 101 11 119 12 120 13 14 15 16 179 1945 1949 1960 1970 1974 1979 1990 1994 1996 2 2002 2003 2004 2005 2007 2008 2009 2010 21 240 29 3 33 4 419 5 57 590 6 63 64 68 7 71 8 81 8th 9 abil access accompani acquir acquisit across action activ actor actual adam addison addison-wesley administr advanc afghanistan aggress agre alli allow alon also america among analysi anarch andrew anoth april argentina argu arm art asia asian assert assess assist associ assumpt atop attack attain attempt august axi b back balanc ballist bang becom behavior believ benefit bomb brazil buck build bureaucrat bush c capabl capitul categor caus challeng chang china claim close close-mind coerciv cold come compel compens compet compil concept concern conclus condit confid consequ contemporari continu contradict contrast control convent cost countri creat critic curb current dabbl dailynk danger daniel day day-to-day decentr decis decreas defens defianc deficit defin demand democrat demonstr depend design desir despit destruct deter deterr deton devast develop dialogu dilemma disappear discourag disharmoni dispos dissuas distribut doctrin domest domin downfal downplay downward drive earli east eastern econom economi ed edn effect elsewher emerg encourag end endur engag enjoy ensur environment equal equat era escal establish etel europ evapor even evil exacerb exampl exchang explain expos facil fall favor fear first fit follow food forc former freez fulfil futur gain game gandhi generat georg given global glorious goal goe gonz govern gray11/29/2011 great growth guarante hegemoni help herein hierarchi high hinder hiroshima hold huntley ibid il imbal immin impetus import incent includ increas india ineffect influenc influenti initi insecur instabl institut int integr interest intern introduct involv iraq irrat issu j jame japan japanes jervi john jong jong-il kenneth key kim klapper knowledg korea korean l label lack late launch leader less level lie like limit littl logic logist long long-term longer longman look loss low m mass matthew maxim may mean mearsheim middl militar militari million mind missil model motiv mrs must n nagasaki name nation necessari need neither neorealist new no.3 non non-threaten norm north northeast norton notabl nuclear obtain occupi octob offici oil one one-third open orient overal overreach overrid oxford pact paper part parti path peac pearson perceiv percept perspect place play player point polit posit possess possibl post power predict preemptiv present preserv presid press prevail prevent previous primari princeton princip prior problem product program prolifer promin proof propon protect proven provid provok public purpos pursu pursuit putin pyongyang quell quest quo rais ration readi readili realiti realm recogn reduc reform regard regim region relat reli relianc remain requir restart restor restrain restraint retali revers rise risk rival robert rogu role run russia sagan said sake sanction sanford sci scientist scobel scott search seat secur security-ori security-rel seek seen select self self-help self-reli serv shape shift shortag show sign signal sinc sino sino-north sit small smallest solidifi solingen south sovereignti soviet spend spiral start state status stem stockpil strateg strategi strike strong structur studi substanti success suffer suit sum summit superior support suprem surviv system take technolog term terror terrorist test theoret theori third thirst thought threat threaten three thus timberlakepol time today tool toward trade tragedi treati two u.s ultim umbrella un union univers unwil unwilling updat us use utopian valu variabl various vietnam vision vladimir vol w wade wage waltz war weaken weapon well wesley wherea whether will winter within work world would york zero zero-sum