Essays /

Northern Spotted Owl Versus Loggers Essay

Essay preview

The Northern Spotted Owl versus Loggers The Northern Spotted owl controversy can be traced back as far as 1973 when the US department of the interior listed the northern spotted owl as a potentially endangered species. Since then, the spotted owl was officially listed as Threatened, and became a symbol of all things environmental during the late 1980s and early 1990s. The listing threatened to restrain logging in the remaining stands of old growth forests. This resulted in a confrontation as well as a dilemma, portrayed as ?Jobs versus owl.? The forests of the Pacific Northwest are among the last reaming old growth forests in North America. Northern spotted owls rely on these old growth forests because they provide cool, damp conditions, with plenty of holes and cavities to roost in. The forests structures and content is also valuable to the lumber companies. Lumbering in the old growth forest of the Pacific Northwest is now a federal issue. Ninety percent of old growth forests is on federal land, managed by the U.S. Forest Service. Lumber companies that operate in these forests ate licensed by the federal government. The logging industry has made millions of dollars from the harvesting of old growth lumber over the past several decades. They have recently become more responsible about clear-cut logging. Harvested forests ate often replant...

Read more


00 000 100 120 126 1973 1980s 1990 1990s 1995 2 21 30 50 500 57 69 70 80 83 abl acr across act action adapt advantag afsee also america american among anim area around ate attempt attract avail back base becam becom begin believ biologist bird birdwatch blem blm bonner bring brush burton cannot cascad case caus caviti chain chang clear clear-cut closur come comment compani complet complic condit confid confront consensus consid construct consult content continu control controversi cook cool corpor cost could cours court creat crucial cut damp debat decad declin dens depart depend desir destroy differ dilemma disput district divers dnr doesn dollar due earli ecosystem educ effici effort employe endang entir environment environmentalist erin ethic even exclus expect expert extinct face fact famili far feder file fire fleck focus food forc forest fought futur gain generat get go goe govern group growth habit habitat happen harvest healthi help high hole home hope howev huge hunt import inadvert inc includ individu industri instead interest interior issu job joe keep known lack land largest larri last late learn least left less librari licens life like lint list live log logger look lost lumber lyon made make manag massiv matur may meantim middl migrat mill million money monitor much much-public must narrow natur need neither nest new newer nineti north northern northwest numer oblig occupi offici often old one onlin open oper option order oregon other otherwis owl pacif past pay peopl percent place plain plan plant play plenti polic popul portion portray potenti preserv presid prevent prey price privat produc profit progress prohibit properti protect provid public public-trust question radius re realli ream recent region relat reli remain replant report requir resourc respons restrain restrict result rod role roost roseburg ross rule rural say schaleg school sedentari see servic sever short short-term show side sinc skyrocket small spark speci spot stake stand state still stop strong structur student suit suprem surround surviv sweet symbol term territori thing thousand threaten timber time timer took tourist trace tree tri trust type u.s uncut unit unrestrict upward us use usual valid valuabl vast versus vocal vulner washington well whether whole wildlif wise within work worth would wouldn year younger