Essays /

Not As Easy As 1 Essay

Essay preview

Literature Review
The study of organizational justice refers to the perceived outcome of fairness in the workplace. Organizational justice come in three forms: Distributive justice, procedural justice and interactional justice. McShane refers to distributive justice as the perceived fairness in the individual’s ratio of outcomes to contributions compared with a comparison other’s ratio of outcomes to contributions. Where as procedural justice is the fairness of the procedures used to decide the distribution of resources (McShane, 2013, p. 155). Interactional justice was also first introduced as the sensitivity to the quality of interpersonal treatment they receive during the enactment of organizational procedures (Bies & Moag, 1986). Distributive justice refers to the perceived fairness of the outcome. This was primarily based off the equity theory: a theory explaining how people develop perceptions of fairness in the distribution and exchange of resources (McShane, 2013, p. 156). This meaning an individual perceives whether or not there is a fair ratio between their inputs and outcomes. An individual’s input can range from numerous things such as: knowledge, effort or experience in exchange for outcomes such as: rewards, recognition, pay or satisfaction (Foster, 2008, p. 26-27) Procedural justice focuses on the fairness in the procedure in which resources are distributed. The first way to improve procedural justice is to give the employees a voice thus making them feel better after giving them an opportunity to speak. The second option to...

Read more


-21 -27 -49 -6 /books?id=6jkebecsl68c&printsec=frontcover#v=onepone&q&f=false /books?id=ihtuqypztv4c&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false 1 155 156 1986 2 20 2007 2008 2009 2013 26 3 34 4 4th abc academi ad affect allow also anger anoth appreci area argu aspect australia b back bakhshi base behalf behaviour beta better bie big bonus bowen break broken build busi came case chang choic circumst clear client come commit communic compar comparison compon concern conclus connect consider consult contribut convers could courtesi criteria critic critis cropanzano ct custom d daniel deal decid decis deeper defin demor desk detail develop diagnosi director distribut e earlier easi ed effort elig emerg employe enact encount encourag ensur entic equiti even everi everyon exchang experi explain explan fair favour feel felt final first fit focus follow form foster four futur general georg get gilliland give given global go gone good greater greenwich hard high hill hour hr idea implement improv inadequ includ increas individu inform input insight instruct interact intern interperson introduc involv j jai janet job journal justic justif k kept knowledg kumar l later leav list literatur long longer ltd made make maker manag match mate may mcgraw mcgraw-hil mcshane mean meet miscommun mistreat moag month moral need north notic nsw numer occur offer one opportun option organ organis organiz other outcom outstand p pass pay peopl perceiv percept period person perspect plan point polit possibl potenti prais predictor press prevent primarili probat procedur process project promis pti push qualiti r rang rani rather ratio realis reason receiv recognit recommend recoveri refer reflect repli report resent resign resist resourc respect retriev review reward round run ryde satisfact say second sensit servic show similar sinc situat speak specif staff stand start state stay step straight studi system take taken team theori thing think thorough thought three thus told toward treat treatment trimarco trimarco-beta truth turn two type unbias understand unfair unless unsur use usual valid valu vast voic w way well wellb wherea whether whilst willing within work workplac would