Essays /

Government Regulation Obesity Essay

Essay preview

Chris DeWitt

Mrs. Hastings

College Prep II

6 October 2014

Government Regulation of Sugar

"Science shows that too much sugar-i.e., the amount consumed by the average American-leads to high blood pressure, dyslipidemia, fatty liver, insulin resistance and pancreatitis" (Schmidt). Obesity is a rapidly growing problem in America, and sugars being so prevalent in the American diet could be to blame for this. Consequently, a growing group of people in America are beginning to believe that the government should regulate unhealthy foods such as sugar to help combat obesity. Many Americans believe that since sugar-saturated and other unhealthy foods are so cheap and widely available, the government should intervene to help make these products less widely available and promote healthier food options. Although, as with any issue, there are also people against government regulation of sugar who believe that this regulation would be negative, and limit our personal rights. What the people against regulation don't realize is that there are many ways for the government to regulate sugars foods without overstepping their bounds. Government regulation of foods perceived as bad for health such as sugar would be a positive move for America, but the key is in moderation of these regulatory strategies. Too much government interference could infringe on the rights of Americans.

While many people support the idea of government regulation of these sugary foods, there are also people who claim that this regulation will infringe on our rights and then limit our choices in foods, and be ineffective toward fighting obesity. While this is partially true, there are plenty of ways for the government to regulate sugary foods without going too far, which will result in effectively fighting obesity. Michael Marlow and Sherzod Abdukadirov say that when the government steps in "Unfortunately, citizens have little choice but to pay higher taxes and obey laws ...

Read more


03 1 12 14 18 2 2012 2013 2014 24 5 6 80 abdukadirov abl abund access accomplish across actual ad add agre agricultur almost along also altern although america american american-lead amount anoth antonia anyth appl approach area aren ask associ author avail averag avoid awar away bad ban basi begin believ blame blood bodi boston bottl bound break buy calori cancer case caus challeng chang cheap cheaper choic chris chronic cite citizen claim coca coca-cola coffer cola colleg combat compani complet consequ consid consum consumpt context context._ continu contribut corpor could counti creat custom d deborah decreas dell demonstr dens dewitt diabet diet differ diseas distributor doesn doubter dramat drastic drink drop due dyslipidemia e easi easier eat ed educ effect effort empti enough environ epidem eventu evid exampl excess expens expert extrem famili far farmington farther fast fatti favorit fda feb fight fill find focus food fox front fructos fuel get globe go govern great greater greenhaven groceri group grow hand harm hast health healthi healthier heart help high higher hill host idea ii ill impact implement incent includ increas ineffect infring ingest instead insulin intak interfer interven intervent issu jame jr june junk key kill kj kotz lace lack lankford larg larger laura law lead less levin like limit littl live liver lot main make mani manipul march market marlow may mcdonald mean metabol method mi michael moder money move mrs much n.d need negat network new news noth nudg obes obey obvious octob offer one oppos option order other overstep pair pancreat partial pass pay peopl perceiv person plan plenti point polici posit poverti poverty-dens prep preserv press pressur preval price problem process produc product promot prone quick rais rapid rate rather reach realiz reason reduc regul regulatori relat report research resist resolv respons restrict result right rise ronald rpt satur say schmidt scienc scientif see sept set sever sherzod shore shouldn show signific sinc soar social soda solv spend stagger step stop store strategi stroke studi subt success sugar sugar-i sugar-satur sugar-to sugari suggest support take tasti tax tend thing think thus time toward toxic tri trigger true type u.s unfortun unhealthi urg us use usual varieti viewpoint want water way web welfar well wholesom wide without won work world would wrong york